Skip to main content
29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2020 at 4:03 comment added supercat I don't know if stores still do this, but I've seen some stores which would issue their own credentials for regular customers who wished to use checks. If a store that had such a policy also happened to sell firearms, buying a gun with cash would require a government-issued ID, but buying one wish a check would require both a government ID and the store-issued credential.
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/
Jan 13, 2017 at 12:22 history edited Brythan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 167 characters in body
Jan 11, 2017 at 23:39 history edited user11643 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 624 characters in body
Jan 11, 2017 at 21:23 history edited ESultanik CC BY-SA 3.0
Added Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2017 at 21:20 comment added Loren Pechtel Another thought comes to mind: Most people only have one photo ID, the second "ID" they would present would be a credit card. Someone who has a credit card is less likely to bounce a check than someone who doesn't. Thus such a policy could be reasonable even if the first ID was beyond question.
Mar 22, 2012 at 15:00 vote accept DavRob60
Nov 3, 2011 at 12:18 comment added Oddthinking Let's take this to chat.
Nov 3, 2011 at 10:40 comment added Nicktar @Oddthinking When I need an ID to by a firearm (hopefully) and another one to pay by cheque that makes one to by a firearm and two to pay for it by cheque... Ruins the effect but I think it'd satisfy the original claim, sorry.
Nov 2, 2011 at 22:37 comment added Oddthinking @Nicktar, interesting. I am trying to read the sentence with your interpretation. You are saying that if I demand a photo-ID with an address for all check purchases AND a gun license (which I assume does NOT have an address - I have never seen one) for all gun purchases, that would satisfy the criteria? That's not an interesting claim :-(
Nov 2, 2011 at 16:50 comment added Nicktar @Oddtinking I'd like to disagree with your counting "as one each". The claim can be read as one to buy a firearm and another to pay by cheque. Since the claim made in the comic only states that two IDs are required to pay by cheque when buying a firearm. Nothing's said about buying something else...
Nov 2, 2011 at 15:25 comment added Flimzy @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇: Many states do regulate that you cannot ask for more than a single ID when accepting a check, as the answer points out. When this isn't mandated, though, you are right, it often is left up to the policy of the individual stores.
Nov 2, 2011 at 13:25 comment added Oddthinking @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇: Agreed. This approach only works if every state forbids asking for two forms of ID for checks, which may not be the case, in which case this answer will be inconclusive. The counter case would be to find just one shop with a policy of selling guns with one piece of ID for a cash sale and two forms for check sales.
Nov 2, 2011 at 13:22 comment added Oddthinking @Flimzy: Presumably the requirement for two forms of ID is to make stealing, forging or obtaining sufficient ID through fraud more difficult. The effort to legally obtain the original ID isn't relevant in the first two cases.
Nov 2, 2011 at 13:16 comment added Mr. Shiny and New 安宇 Isn't this approach flawed, in that selling guns is regulated and the vendor is required to ask for ID, but accepting cheques is not regulated and it's more of a corporate policy about how much ID is required to pay by cheque? I.E. this depends on the individual stores in any state/jurisdiction that requires only one form of ID to buy a gun
Nov 2, 2011 at 12:43 comment added DavRob60 I fond a comment here stating that kentucky could be a winner. Someone could verify that?
Nov 2, 2011 at 9:42 history edited Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 225 characters in body
Nov 2, 2011 at 9:33 history edited Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 225 characters in body
Nov 2, 2011 at 9:27 history edited Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Nov 2, 2011 at 9:22 history edited Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Nov 2, 2011 at 8:56 comment added Flimzy In researching, it is apparant that many states require a state-issued firearm permit/license of some sort. In such states, purchasing a firearm likely only requires showing said permit, regardless of whether additional forms of ID were required to obtain the permit. This may render the original claim technically true, but also rather misleading.
Nov 2, 2011 at 8:54 history edited Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
Add info about Illinois
Nov 2, 2011 at 8:16 comment added jwenting yes, but then you'd have to find as well that law in those states requires that an ID used for one purpose in a transaction can not be also used for another purpose in the same transaction (iow it must be illegal to use the ID presented for the gun registration form for the purpose of validating the check, I highly doubt such laws are on the book anywhere).
Nov 2, 2011 at 8:06 comment added Oddthinking @jwenting, Yes, for the states with a *, the focus is now on how much id is requested for a check. Some (possibly all? To be seen.) of the states, it seems, have privacy laws that protect people from being asked for too much ID. Asking for one id (e.g. gun license) for the purchase and another (e.g. driver's license) for the check counts, I think, as one each.
Nov 2, 2011 at 8:01 comment added jwenting as gun purchase procedures are seemingly identical or close to in most states, you should start looking at the differences between states in the requirements to issue personal checks in payment (and not necessarily for guns), which may differ between locale and even bank and acceptant. Of course those will need to require more different IDs than just the gun purchase, else the IDs needed for that can double to identify the buyer for the purpose of validating the check.
Nov 2, 2011 at 3:35 comment added Hendy Other than the CA reference... can anyone even point one in the right direction in terms of where to look? My google-fu is coming up empty handed for MN. Should we be looking in state legislature, some type of business regulation documents, or something else?
Nov 2, 2011 at 3:32 history edited Oddthinking CC BY-SA 3.0
added 99 characters in body
Nov 2, 2011 at 3:25 history edited Oddthinking CC BY-SA 3.0
Added NICS states; Post Made Community Wiki
Nov 2, 2011 at 3:05 history answered Oddthinking CC BY-SA 3.0