Skip to main content

Timeline for Can any fish climb trees?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/
Apr 11, 2015 at 12:37 comment added Oddthinking @george: No problem. The edict to "Be Bold" when editing it always going to lead to going too far occasionally. Worth the cost.
Apr 11, 2015 at 5:18 comment added Online User @Oddthinking: sorry for the bad edits. I thought the OP was doubting the authenticity of the quote.
Apr 11, 2015 at 4:08 history rollback Oddthinking
Rollback to Revision 3
Apr 11, 2015 at 3:31 history edited Online User
edited tags
Oct 27, 2011 at 1:19 history edited Oddthinking CC BY-SA 3.0
added 155 characters in body
Jul 24, 2011 at 11:12 history edited Oddthinking CC BY-SA 3.0
Simplified title
Jul 23, 2011 at 16:16 comment added Daniel Roseman All extant mammals, reptiles, birds and amphibians are descended from fish, and therefore, cladistically speaking, are classified as fish. So in fact there are millions of fish that can climb trees.
Jul 23, 2011 at 7:30 vote accept Golden Cuy
Jul 22, 2011 at 21:34 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/94520619047202816
Jul 22, 2011 at 12:38 comment added Chad Actually its not a claim that fish are incapable of doing it, just that it is not reasonable to judge them by a criteria that is irrelevant to being a fish.
Jul 22, 2011 at 11:35 answer added Thursagen timeline score: 40
Jul 22, 2011 at 11:10 comment added Suma Does each bon mot classify as a claim? What about: "Cow cannot catch a hare?" (Czech proverb) Moreover, even if it would be a claim, it does not speak about all fish, only about "a fish". I understand analysing absurdities like this may be a fun, but I think this site is about real and notable claims.
Jul 22, 2011 at 10:56 answer added Oddthinking timeline score: 19
Jul 22, 2011 at 10:44 history asked Golden Cuy CC BY-SA 3.0