Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 11, 2022 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/1513305889020825606
Apr 8, 2022 at 19:04 vote accept Evan Carroll
Apr 7, 2022 at 17:03 comment added Evan Carroll @LShaver all good, it happens.
Apr 7, 2022 at 17:00 comment added LShaver @EvanCarroll I guess I was assuming a subtext of "the U.S. claimed they'd stop buying Russian oil and here's proof they didn't", which is impossible to refute at this point because of the Treasury authorization. However I see that you've limited the claim to just the oil purchase.
Apr 7, 2022 at 3:04 comment added Evan Carroll @LShaver that doesn't make any sense. The claim isn't referencing the future nor the treasury: "the US increased [past-tense] crude oil supplies from Russia by 43 percent, or 100,000 barrels per day over the past week [past-tense]".
Apr 7, 2022 at 1:53 history became hot network question
Apr 6, 2022 at 20:51 review Close votes
Apr 7, 2022 at 17:41
Apr 6, 2022 at 20:33 comment added LShaver Given the U.S. Treasury authorization which allows active contracts to proceed through April 22nd, I'm voting to close this question as being about a current event. I think it should be re-opened once data through April 22 is available.
Apr 6, 2022 at 18:59 comment added days of love iff good genes Related if not exactly the same Q politics.stackexchange.com/questions/72398/… The Russian claim is "over the past week" not year-over-year.
Apr 6, 2022 at 18:46 vote accept Evan Carroll
Apr 6, 2022 at 18:47
Apr 6, 2022 at 18:45 answer added Giter timeline score: 15
Apr 6, 2022 at 18:31 answer added Schwern timeline score: 55
Apr 6, 2022 at 17:50 history asked Evan Carroll CC BY-SA 4.0