Timeline for Did Canada "mandate the content of voluntary speech"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 at 21:51 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jan 2, 2022 at 18:41 | |||||
| Jan 1, 2022 at 3:13 | comment | added | Rebecca J. Stones | It seems this answer is "disobeying a judge in relation to X is considered contempt of court" and "contempt of court can land you in jail", where X is hypothetical pronoun usage. (Plus a sprinkling of outrage.) | |
| Dec 31, 2021 at 18:16 | comment | added | user11643 | I removed all the opinion at the end. We don't allow that in answers on this site. | |
| S Dec 31, 2021 at 18:15 | review | First answers | |||
| Jan 1, 2022 at 21:57 | |||||
| S Dec 31, 2021 at 18:15 | history | edited | user11643 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 936 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2021 at 12:26 | comment | added | F1Krazy | I think this hinges on how you interpret the phrase "refused to use a preferred pronoun". You've interpreted this as "someone asks you to refer to her as 'she/her', and you address her without using pronouns at all". I would interpret it instead as "someone asks you to refer to her as 'she/her', and you instead refer to her as 'he/him'", which tracks with what Cossman says in the preceding paragraph. | |
| Dec 31, 2021 at 12:26 | comment | added | IMSoP | Outside of the opinion, which doesn't really belong here, I can't see much here that isn't covered by the existing answers. | |
| Dec 31, 2021 at 12:20 | history | edited | F1Krazy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed formatting
|
| Dec 31, 2021 at 8:21 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 3, 2022 at 0:34 | |||||
| S Dec 31, 2021 at 8:04 | review | First answers | |||
| Dec 31, 2021 at 16:17 | |||||
| S Dec 31, 2021 at 8:04 | history | answered | Studebaker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |