Skip to main content
Notice removed Needs detailed answers by Oddthinking
Added sources from comments, cleaned up argumentative phrases. I don't necessarily agree with this answer but feel it's perspective deserves to be recognized.
Source Link
reirab
  • 4.1k
  • 21
  • 25

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They include defense, suicide, and accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. It can be argued that these are not violence. While one can define 'gun violence' to include these as the GVA does, much of the audience will interpret violence as implied in 'violent crime'. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is manipulating perception.

Suicides account for approximately 60% of total gun deaths each year while accidentsaccidental deaths from firearms are estimated by researchers to occur at a rate of slightly more than 1 per day. When these statistics are used as an allusion to deaths caused by violent conflict, the figures are off by at least 167% (1/0.60) of the actual value.

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They include defense, suicide, and accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. It can be argued that these are not violence. While one can define 'gun violence' to include these as the GVA does, much of the audience will interpret violence as implied in 'violent crime'. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is manipulating perception.

Suicides account for approximately 60% of total gun deaths each year while accidents occur at a rate of slightly more than 1 per day. When these statistics are used as an allusion to deaths caused by violent conflict, the figures are off by at least 167% (1/0.60) of the actual value.

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They include defense, suicide, and accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. It can be argued that these are not violence. While one can define 'gun violence' to include these as the GVA does, much of the audience will interpret violence as implied in 'violent crime'. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is manipulating perception.

Suicides account for approximately 60% of total gun deaths each year while accidental deaths from firearms are estimated by researchers to occur at a rate of slightly more than 1 per day. When these statistics are used as an allusion to deaths caused by violent conflict, the figures are off by at least 167% (1/0.60) of the actual value.

Added sources from comments, cleaned up argumentative phrases. I don't necessarily agree with this answer but feel it's perspective deserves to be recognized.
Source Link

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They includedinclude defense, suicide, and accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. Accidents It can be argued that these are not violence. So While one can define 'gun violence' to include these as the GVA does, much of the audience will interpret violence as implied in 'violent crime'. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is either mistaken or lyingmanipulating perception.

Suicides account for approximately 60% of total gun deaths each year while accidents occur at a rate of slightly more than 1 per day. When these statistics are used as an allusion to deaths caused by violent conflict, the figures are off by at least 167% (1/0.60) of the actual value.

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They included accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. Accidents are not violence. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is either mistaken or lying.

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They include defense, suicide, and accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. It can be argued that these are not violence. While one can define 'gun violence' to include these as the GVA does, much of the audience will interpret violence as implied in 'violent crime'. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is manipulating perception.

Suicides account for approximately 60% of total gun deaths each year while accidents occur at a rate of slightly more than 1 per day. When these statistics are used as an allusion to deaths caused by violent conflict, the figures are off by at least 167% (1/0.60) of the actual value.

Mod Moved Comments To Chat
Notice added Needs detailed answers by user11643
Source Link

Nope.

'Gun Violence Archive' has discredited themselves by padding the numbers.

They included accidental deaths like this one in their list of "violent" deaths. Accidents are not violence. So no, the 'Gun Violence Archive' is either mistaken or lying.