Timeline for Is hydroxychloroquine + zinc + antibiotics an effective treatment for COVID-19?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
46 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 4, 2021 at 7:09 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 4, 2021 at 7:09 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 27, 2021 at 6:08 | history | bounty started | tuskiomi | ||
| S May 27, 2021 at 6:08 | history | notice added | tuskiomi | Current answers are outdated | |
| S Aug 18, 2020 at 8:18 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 18, 2020 at 8:18 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 11, 2020 at 8:17 | history | notice added | Jamiec♦ | Content dispute | |
| S Aug 11, 2020 at 8:17 | history | locked | Jamiec♦ | ||
| Aug 6, 2020 at 9:41 | answer | added | Mad Scientist♦ | timeline score: 17 | |
| Aug 6, 2020 at 1:36 | comment | added | Mark | Does it count as "not dying of COVID-19" if you die of something else first? | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 18:13 | history | edited | user17561 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2020 at 11:54 | answer | added | matt_black | timeline score: 37 | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 9:07 | comment | added | user17561 | @Shadur Except there actually was a sophisticated conspiracy to make HCQ look bad: theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/… | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 8:59 | comment | added | Shadur-don't-feed-the-AI | That site looks only slightly more professional than your average "9/11 was an inside job" or "Benghazi was a coverup" analysis site. | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 8:47 | comment | added | user17561 | @Shadur c19study.com actually tracks all HCQ studies, with or without the extras | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 8:15 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 1, 2020 at 18:37 | comment | added | matt_black | @MaxB why is it confusing to trust the clinical protocol rather than a 3rd party interview? Did your source have some extra insight beyond the media interview? | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 17:36 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black The "twitter" guy is actually an MD (who happens to have called out the Lancet study fraud earlier than most). I don't see what France Soir has to do with the issue. You seem very confused. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 13:37 | comment | added | matt_black | @maxb While i'm sure France Soir and Twitter are totally reliable sources for clinical information, I read the actual study report and those claimed issues are clearly not what the study did. Check the sources not the newspapers. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 4:15 | history | edited | user17561 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 1, 2020 at 1:25 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black I'm not confusing them. Again, see the link I posted. It links 2 tweets about the overdosing. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:14 | comment | added | matt_black | @MaxB The point is why are there so few well-designed studies testing the idea of early treatment. Using careful randomised designs like Recovery. Recovery showed big benefits from dexamethasone and none for HCQ in hospitalised patients. That is a solid result. That's what I said. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:10 | comment | added | matt_black | @maxb You are confusing Recovery with the withdrawn Lancet study which did seem to make that mistake. You should read the actual details. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:10 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black Your point was "The same study saw no benefit for HCQ". Own what you said. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:06 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black It's wasn't well designed, according to some docs. They confused HCQ with another hydro-something medication, when choosing dosage, and gave lethal doses to patients. See the link I posted. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:03 | comment | added | matt_black | @MaxB Yes recovery was for hospitalised patients. But the point is it was a well-designed study, unlike most others. If HCQ works early then this sort of study should have been done in the same controlled way. Most of the studies with media attention have much weaker if not fundamentally flawed designs. | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 22:47 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black c19study.com/recovery.html | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 22:44 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black That one looked at hospitalized patients. As I understand it, COVID has 2 phases: (1) the virus is multiplying (2) immune system overreacts. HCQ/zinc is claimed to be beneficial in that first phase, while immunosuppressors in the second one. | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 22:35 | comment | added | matt_black | Links to various results of the Recovery trial including HCQ and dexamethasone | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 22:27 | comment | added | user17561 | @matt_black link? | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 22:19 | comment | added | matt_black | There are at least some good randomised studies on potential covid treatments. That's why we know dexamethasone (another cheap old drug) works. The same study saw no benefit for HCQ. | |
| Jul 31, 2020 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/1288987747546537988 | ||
| Jul 30, 2020 at 20:43 | comment | added | user17561 | @bradbury9 RCTs are rare because they are more expensive and take longer (according to Wikipedia) | |
| Jul 30, 2020 at 12:48 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 1, 2020 at 0:26 | |||||
| Jul 30, 2020 at 11:13 | comment | added | bradbury9 | You should not ask evidence against a claim, but evaluate the validity of the evidence that supports it. For example, the NYU study looks weird, I would assume randomized controlled trials are common practice in scientific method. | |
| Jul 30, 2020 at 10:52 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 30, 2020 at 9:50 | history | reopened | Oddthinking♦ | ||
| S Jul 30, 2020 at 9:49 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Jul 30, 2020 at 9:49 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
| Jul 30, 2020 at 9:49 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Quote claims. Given claims both include antibiotics, so include that in the question.
|
| Jul 30, 2020 at 9:13 | history | closed |
Daniel R Hicks Giter Shadur-don't-feed-the-AI Oddthinking♦ |
Needs more focus | |
| Jul 30, 2020 at 8:30 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 30, 2020 at 3:45 | history | edited | user17561 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 308 characters in body
|
| Jul 30, 2020 at 3:21 | history | edited | user17561 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 173 characters in body
|
| Jul 30, 2020 at 3:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 30, 2020 at 9:18 | |||||
| Jul 30, 2020 at 2:31 | history | asked | user17561 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |