Timeline for Can a judge let the parties of a trial resolve their disputes on "the field of battle", legally, in the US?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 23, 2020 at 10:24 | history | edited | SQB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting. (Added name of source in from review)
|
| S Jan 23, 2020 at 10:24 | history | suggested | Ken Graham | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting.
|
| Jan 20, 2020 at 0:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 23, 2020 at 10:24 | |||||
| Jan 19, 2020 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/1218684650530463750 | ||
| Jan 17, 2020 at 8:54 | comment | added | Shadur-don't-feed-the-AI | I would love to see this discussed on law.SE. Although I suspect that the question would need to be rephrased - there are laws and permits to arrange 'cage fights' or MMA matches; what's less clear is whether wagers on the outcome would be considered legally binding without running afoul of gambling laws... | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 3:22 | answer | added | Mark | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 15, 2020 at 21:45 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | This would be better asked at Law.SE, where (legal) opinions are accepted. Clearly, the judge in this case has not ruled on the question, and it will be difficult to answer here. | |
| Jan 15, 2020 at 19:59 | history | asked | Franck Dernoncourt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |