Timeline for Is there a 2.5 mile diameter object crawling along the Pacific floor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 18, 2019 at 21:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/1086367890176163840 | ||
| Jan 15, 2019 at 2:50 | comment | added | Daniel R Hicks | Boy, talk about your fake news!! The track is only 2.3 miles wide! | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 0:39 | comment | added | Laurel | This was also reported on by the Daily Mail. Despite their reputation, they are a notable source, so the claim is notable. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:37 | answer | added | Henry | timeline score: 32 | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:20 | comment | added | user32299 | The article makes it very obvious that there was no object found, only patterns in elevation data that can be interpreted as — but that have not been positively identified as — "tracks". So — still — no, there has not been any 2.5 mile wide object found. Also I claim that "Sputnik News" is not notable. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 7:07 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Context. Quote more of the claim. Remove mountain reference. Remove "unique" as meaningless.
|
| Jan 6, 2019 at 6:32 | history | edited | hanugm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 217 characters in body
|
| Jan 5, 2019 at 19:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 14, 2019 at 19:08 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2019 at 18:46 | history | edited | hanugm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 322 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jan 5, 2019 at 18:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 7, 2019 at 8:26 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2019 at 18:39 | history | asked | hanugm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |