A better way of stating the claimNo, 7% is as Dr. Galvin Asomewhat too high. Schmitt does on this
According to NASA siteRecent Climatology, Variability, and Trends in Global Surface Humidity Journal of Climate, (2006) volume 19, pages 3589-3606:
as temperature risesThe observed dq/dT is about 0.58, the0.38, and 0.77 g kg-1 °C-1(r2 = 0.81, 0.77, and 0.76) for annual maximum sustainable water vapor concentration increases byq and T for the globe, global land, and ocean, respectively. In percentage terms, they are about 7%4.9%, 4.3%, and 5.7% change in q per degree Celsius1°C warming, which are close to those (∼5.4%, 5.1%, and 5.5% per 1°C, respectively) suggested by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation or its empirical version [Eq. (3)] for saturation specific humidity (computed locally and then area averaged). 1
Thenwhere "q" is specific humidity, look at a water vapor pressure table"T" is temperature, and "dq/dT" is the rate of change of specific humidity with respect to temperature.
Near 0 degrees C, the per cent increase per degreeand where footnote 1 is about 8%.:
The Clausius–Clapeyron equation locally gives 6.2%–6.4% change per 1°C in surface saturation specific humidity (qs) for air temperature within 15°–20°C. For regional averages, however, this percentage is lower because the area-averaged mean qs is higher than that calculated using the Clausius–Clapeyron equation and area-averaged mean air temperature and pressure.
At 25 degrees CSo, in conclusion, the increasecorrect value is about 6% per degree4.9%.