In addition to the other excellent answers, which already show that the product is not to be trusted, I'd like to point out two more reasons why one should be worried about the "research" being presented.
Firstly I'd like to point out that the article is not published is not published, thus, not peer reviewed. While it might look like actual research, it's just a pdf that anyone can put together, whereas public scientific research is peer reviewed, and thus paragraphs like
While the science being reported is esoteric and theoretical in many respects, such definitive results warrant further evaluation of this product as well as the use of scalar waves in other applications.
would probably be removed in case of publication as their results certainly do not warrant that - in fact, their results have nothing to do with "other applications" for example.
Secondly, I'd like to point out that the authors of the papers are indeed Medical Doctors (see "Facial beauty" and "Doctor Ben"), but not one that ever published any other scientific research (source: Google Scholar searches of "Paul Ver Hoeve", "Ver Hoeve Paul", "Ver Hoeve dermatology", "Ben Johnson dermatology")
In particular, while I support everyone that wants to genuinely help people with cancer, I would certainly not trust and stay away from anything that someone like Mr. Johnson endorses, since on his site he offers embarrassing and frankly hard to believe "complementary cures" for cancer such as "coffee enemas".
a coffee enema speeds up the detoxification process
Also elsewhere he suggest the use of many molecules which are not yet proven to work, or proven not to work, which is also not ethical at all.