Timeline for Is there any evidence of Dr. Zakir Naik paying people to convert to Islam?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2017 at 8:00 | comment | added | Lio Elbammalf | @Mohammad Sure, but your question was whether he was giving people money to convert. You seem to have accepted that he was but are now questioning whether it is illegal. I'm not saying you've not got reason to question that but it should be as a new question rather than debated in the comments. | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 14:09 | comment | added | Sakib Arifin | @LioElbammalf The answer is quoting a report that is speculative. The allegations aren't proven yet. | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 12:47 | comment | added | Lio Elbammalf | @MohammadSakibArifin Your question was whether or not he was paying people. Motivations and ethics don't seem to be part of the problem. This answer addresses the question of whether he paid people, whether it is illegal is another question (and maybe not one we can answer). | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 10:46 | comment | added | Sakib Arifin | @pericles316 And what he said is perfectly protected under India's speech laws. He is prosecuted with Zero evidence while the ruling party is vocally converting Muslims and Christians with their money. And his organization does spend money in the conversion process. In some states in India, you need the permission of the state to change religion. This is put in place to keep Hindus from converting to other religions. It requires a lot of money to get the permission from the state (lawyer, fees etc). His organization provides lawyers for new converts. I don't see how that's illegal... | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 10:33 | comment | added | Sakib Arifin | @pericles316 your first link is dead. And most of the things said on the second link is true but it also has many "...." in the quotes. The thing is, he is a salafi preachers who gets money from the Saudi Government (Ally of US). His primary role is preaching and he doesn't have any political affiliations. The speech they cite about him is an old clip of early 2000s when "liberators" where leveling down cities populated with Sunni Muslims. Many Muslim scholars made a lot of distasteful statements then. Why is he punished for it now? And how does that count as evidence of him inciting terror? | |
| Feb 20, 2017 at 16:32 | comment | added | pericles316 | @MohammadSakibArifin-So Najibullah Zazi the Afghan-American was also a fake planted by the Indian government and his accusation of planning suicide bombings on the New York City Subway system is also untrue? | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 17:00 | comment | added | Sakib Arifin | @pericles316 Look, Indian government fakes a lot of things. I can prove some of them to be untrue but when it comes to investigations, they often fabricate evidence to keep the public cool. If they don't lie about some things, then riots will start. Lie is better than riots. | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 14:17 | history | edited | DavePhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 11:11 | comment | added | pericles316 | @MohammadSakibArifin-It is also alleged that terror suspects such as Mohammad Ibrahim Yazdani, Najibullah Zazi, Kafeel Ahmed were inspired by Dr. Zakir Naik-theweek.in/news/india/…. Is that untrue? You can also inspired to form a question on this too-indiatoday.intoday.in/story/… like you did on my prior answer :) | |
| Dec 30, 2016 at 9:11 | comment | added | Sakib Arifin | @DavidGrinberg He supports the mainstream salafi movement which is currently at war with Daesh. The claim simply doesn't make any sense. It's based on a dead report which says Dhaka attackers followed him on social media. | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 20:43 | comment | added | David says Reinstate Monica | @MohammadSakibArifin Do you have anything to corroborate your dispute? | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 14:09 | history | answered | DavePhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |