Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 20, 2016 at 20:40 comment added PoloHoleSet While he may be wrong (and I emphasize MAY because I don't know), I don't think he's confusing it with the classified documents discussion. I think he's specifically addressing the idea that the emails were illegally obtained (hacking is illegal).
Oct 18, 2016 at 11:13 comment added Hagen von Eitzen @corsiKa The CIA wouldn't even be in charge for the domestic scenario of the OP
Oct 18, 2016 at 6:14 comment added Sumyrda - remember Monica @ypercubeᵀᴹ No reason except Hanlon's Razor: “Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
Oct 18, 2016 at 0:32 comment added Steve Jessop @corsiKa: no, he's saying the RIAA has potential legal grounds to stop you reading wikileaks, but the CIA doesn't. The CIA has the power to stop you breathing, which would suffice to stop you reading wikileaks ;-)
Oct 17, 2016 at 18:12 comment added ypercubeᵀᴹ "Cuomo has probably confused" is speculation. They might did it on purpose (speculation again). I don't see any reason to assume that they they acted on confusion.
Oct 17, 2016 at 16:03 comment added corsiKa So you're saying the RIAA has the power to stop us from reading wikileaks but the CIA doesn't? Nice.
Oct 17, 2016 at 11:12 comment added Lisa B By the way, the classified State Department WikiLeaks emails are legal to read and possess for US citizens not employed by the government?
Oct 16, 2016 at 23:03 history edited Avery CC BY-SA 3.0
less vague
Oct 16, 2016 at 22:56 history edited Avery CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification
Oct 16, 2016 at 19:37 vote accept Lisa B
Oct 16, 2016 at 19:35 vote accept Lisa B
Oct 16, 2016 at 19:36
Oct 16, 2016 at 19:13 history answered Avery CC BY-SA 3.0