Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 14, 2016 at 12:08 vote accept JonathanReez
S Jul 13, 2016 at 12:57 history suggested unor CC BY-SA 3.0
added tag, added alt content
Jul 13, 2016 at 12:44 comment added Zaibis @TroelsLarsen: I sadly couldn't find any refference yet. I just remember it was probably somewhere between 1550 ~ 1650 and could have been due to the 30 years war. But by anyeffort I wasn't able to look it up for you. if you find something I'd be glad you would share it with me.
Jul 13, 2016 at 12:38 review Suggested edits
S Jul 13, 2016 at 12:57
Jul 13, 2016 at 11:37 comment added Troels Larsen @Zaibis: Out of curiosity - what are you referencing when you talk about drowning knights? It sounds like an interesting story, but not one I've heard. In regards to naughty or nice, it is certainly subjective. Compared to Vlad the Impaler, I am 'nice', but compared to Nicolas Cage, I'll be getting coal in my stockings. Unfortunately, the only authority on niceness only has rules regarding children. And even there there are some controversy regarding his location. Canadians think (incorrectly) that we resides on the North Pole, while all Danes know we lives on Greenland.
Jul 13, 2016 at 11:19 comment added Zaibis @Mast: Well, my point was more about, just beeing in one thing nice isn't what makes a country becoming nice. I would even bet I could dig up something nice about syrias army, but would that make syria a country representative of fair and modern warfare? I doubt so.
Jul 13, 2016 at 10:39 comment added Mast @Zaibis Most countries have some ugly things in their past. That usually doesn't hinder them from becoming 'nice' countries later on.
Jul 13, 2016 at 9:25 comment added Zaibis I'd rather be skeptic about the nice country claim. denmark aswell has a pretty ugly history about ways to fight, like drowning knights in their heavy armors by breaking dams.
Jul 13, 2016 at 5:50 comment added Erwin Bolwidt The picture's claim is wrong because Whisky is spelled Whisky in Canada, not Whiskey. :-)
Jul 13, 2016 at 4:25 comment added PC Luddite Neither country has anything to gain by asserting its claim on a small uninhabited island in the arctic using military force. It'll just waste time, money, and other resources as well as severely weaken their relationship. Really no good would come from it other than a large mound of dirt.
Jul 13, 2016 at 1:02 comment added user29292 Both countries are part of NATO and fought in Afghanistan and Iraq. So the last sentence is a mischaracterisation.
Jul 12, 2016 at 20:28 history edited JonathanReez CC BY-SA 3.0
added 270 characters in body
Jul 12, 2016 at 20:07 comment added Henry If you want bizarre resolutions of such disputes, see the border of the tiny island of Märket between Sweden and Finland
Jul 12, 2016 at 17:18 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/752915135308697604
Jul 12, 2016 at 15:39 comment added JasonR I've always thought this was one of the more charming pieces of internet lore. I am glad to find out that it is mainly based on facts.
Jul 12, 2016 at 14:07 answer added rjzii timeline score: 72
Jul 12, 2016 at 13:51 history asked JonathanReez CC BY-SA 3.0