Skip to main content
explanation
Source Link
pericles316
  • 22.9k
  • 2
  • 87
  • 164

Does low-dose radiation from X-rays or CT scans cause cancer?

Some researchers claim that, despite wide belief, that exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) from computed tomography (CT) and X-ray medical imaging scans does not cause cancer.

Jeffrey Siegel and Charles Pennington wrote a 2015 article for Skeptic magazine arguing that the "Linear No Threshold" model for was not supported by evidence, and that using this model to predict that LDIR was carcinogenic was incorrect.

Eureka Alert report that James Welsh, MD, made a similar claim in a paper published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Is there evidence to support or reject the idea that the low-dose radiation received from medical imaging equipment poses a cancer risk?

Does radiation from X-rays or CT scans cause cancer?

Some researchers claim that, despite wide belief, that exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) from computed tomography (CT) and X-ray medical imaging scans does not cause cancer.

Jeffrey Siegel and Charles Pennington wrote a 2015 article for Skeptic magazine arguing that the "Linear No Threshold" model for was not supported by evidence, and that using this model to predict that LDIR was carcinogenic was incorrect.

Eureka Alert report that James Welsh, MD, made a similar claim in a paper published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Is there evidence to support or reject the idea that the radiation received from medical imaging equipment poses a cancer risk?

Does low-dose radiation from X-rays or CT scans cause cancer?

Some researchers claim that, despite wide belief, that exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) from computed tomography (CT) and X-ray medical imaging scans does not cause cancer.

Jeffrey Siegel and Charles Pennington wrote a 2015 article for Skeptic magazine arguing that the "Linear No Threshold" model for was not supported by evidence, and that using this model to predict that LDIR was carcinogenic was incorrect.

Eureka Alert report that James Welsh, MD, made a similar claim in a paper published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Is there evidence to support or reject the idea that the low-dose radiation received from medical imaging equipment poses a cancer risk?

Moved links associated with inappropriate words. More context to the claims. [Didn't find a key quote from the articles :-(]
Source Link
Oddthinking
  • 144.8k
  • 48
  • 565
  • 657

Researchers such as Jeffrey Siegel and James Welsh reportSome researchers claim that, despite wide belief, that exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) from computed tomography (CT) and X-ray medical imaging scans and X rays do notdoes not cause cancer since we are bathed every second of every day in low-dose radiation that vary annually from.

Jeffrey Siegel and Charles Pennington wrote a few mGy2015 article for Skeptic magazine arguing that the "Linear No Threshold" model for was not supported by evidence, and that using this model to 260 mGypredict that LDIR was carcinogenic was incorrect. So are

Eureka Alert report that James Welsh, MD, made a similar claim in a paper published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Is there any well known negative health effects or documented cancer cases caused by either temporary or high exposureevidence to low dose radiation of X-rays, CT scanssupport or otherreject the idea that the radiation received from medical imaging equipment poses a cancer risk?

Researchers such as Jeffrey Siegel and James Welsh report that exposure to computed tomography (CT) medical imaging scans and X rays do not cause cancer since we are bathed every second of every day in low-dose radiation that vary annually from a few mGy to 260 mGy. So are there any well known negative health effects or documented cancer cases caused by either temporary or high exposure to low dose radiation of X-rays, CT scans or other medical imaging?

Some researchers claim that, despite wide belief, that exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) from computed tomography (CT) and X-ray medical imaging scans does not cause cancer.

Jeffrey Siegel and Charles Pennington wrote a 2015 article for Skeptic magazine arguing that the "Linear No Threshold" model for was not supported by evidence, and that using this model to predict that LDIR was carcinogenic was incorrect.

Eureka Alert report that James Welsh, MD, made a similar claim in a paper published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Is there evidence to support or reject the idea that the radiation received from medical imaging equipment poses a cancer risk?

Source Link
pericles316
  • 22.9k
  • 2
  • 87
  • 164

Does radiation from X-rays or CT scans cause cancer?

Researchers such as Jeffrey Siegel and James Welsh report that exposure to computed tomography (CT) medical imaging scans and X rays do not cause cancer since we are bathed every second of every day in low-dose radiation that vary annually from a few mGy to 260 mGy. So are there any well known negative health effects or documented cancer cases caused by either temporary or high exposure to low dose radiation of X-rays, CT scans or other medical imaging?