Timeline for Does "reverse sound technology" make headphones safer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2018 at 21:58 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | Related: skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/42074/… | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 23:23 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 118 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2016 at 13:16 | history | edited | Christian |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 27, 2015 at 8:22 | comment | added | user22865 | Sounds like you would have to write them first and ask what exactly "Reverse Sound Technology" is. Also: what their specific claim is about making them safer, and what studies they have to support that claim. | |
| Nov 26, 2015 at 22:15 | comment | added | GentlePurpleRain | This patent might provide some information for anyone investigating the answer. "...the high sound pressure waves can be avoided to impact directly on our eardrums so as to eliminate the painful and itchy sensation on our eardrums where the symptoms of middle ear injury that traditional earphones may cause." | |
| Nov 26, 2015 at 4:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/669740752377876480 | ||
| Nov 26, 2015 at 0:43 | comment | added | Jeff Caros | @matt_black The website that is linked to includes the claim. | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 23:31 | comment | added | matt_black | Some references to sources for the claims would improve the question. | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 23:10 | history | edited | Sklivvz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 32 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Nov 25, 2015 at 23:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 25, 2015 at 23:31 | |||||
| Nov 25, 2015 at 22:58 | history | asked | Jeff Caros | CC BY-SA 3.0 |