Timeline for Did birth defects in southern Iraq rise enormously after the US war against Iraq?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2015 at 23:47 | comment | added | Golden Cuy | This is the Skeptics.SE post I was thinking about with regards to The atomic bombing of Japan: skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/1002/104 It indicated no increase in birth defects was detected. | |
| Nov 20, 2015 at 9:23 | answer | added | pericles316 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 12:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/666601330828582912 | ||
| Nov 17, 2015 at 11:34 | comment | added | gerrit | @LorenPechtel To be on-topic, Skeptics requires that claims are notable, not that they are credible. If many people read a particular site (and for globalresearch.ca, I believe they do), are likely to share their articles on social media etc., then those claims do become notable. Also, even on sites that spread mostly conspiracy theories, it's possible that they hit right once in a hundred times. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 7:35 | comment | added | Golden Cuy | Did the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki cause birth defects, apart from those who were growing when the bombing occurred? | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 0:26 | comment | added | Loren Pechtel | This is a conspiracy site, I wouldn't call it a credible claim in the first place. | |
| Nov 16, 2015 at 23:10 | history | asked | Christian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |