Timeline for Are Ashkenazi Jews genetically more European than Semitic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 9 at 20:20 | answer | added | codeMonkey | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 12, 2019 at 7:08 | history | edited | Golden Cuy |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 22, 2015 at 3:15 | vote | accept | Graviton | ||
Sep 18, 2015 at 9:12 | answer | added | pericles316 | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 18, 2015 at 2:19 | comment | added | Graviton | @TylerDurden, assume that Kuban is a part of Europe | |
Sep 17, 2015 at 16:58 | comment | added | Tyler Durden | Do you consider the Kuban to be in Europe? | |
Sep 17, 2015 at 9:53 | comment | added | Graviton | @EnergyNumbers, can this make sense? And is it backup by other publication? | |
Sep 17, 2015 at 7:57 | comment | added | 410 gone | @Graviton the answer to that question is, as with your other questions, in the very article you've cited: Maternal line near-eastern, paternal line european. But what is the actual claim you are sceptical of? | |
Sep 17, 2015 at 0:13 | history | edited | Graviton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
Sep 17, 2015 at 0:11 | comment | added | Graviton | @EnergyNumbers, so, combining these two evidence, where does that point us to? I'll update the question to make it clearer | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 21:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/644259402694983680 | ||
Sep 16, 2015 at 13:42 | comment | added | 410 gone | @Graviton your claim is "is it true that Ashkenazi Jews are actually more European than Semitic genetically". Whereas the article's claim is that the mitochondrial DNA of Ashkenazi Jews is 80% European, and that 50-80% of the Y-chromosome originated in the Near East. | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 11:59 | comment | added | Graviton | @EnergyNumbers, which part of my question is not aligned with the claim in the article? The article claims that ( as per quoted) European Jews mostly descend from people who left Israel is wrong, and I am asking whether this claim is valid | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 11:52 | comment | added | 410 gone | @Graviton I commented in the hope that it would prompt you to clarify the question: it's best to align the claim you are seeking evidence on, to the actual claim made: when claims in questions here have been modified from their original source, things get very messy, and/or the questions get closed for being unclear. | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 11:41 | comment | added | Graviton | @EnergyNumbers, would you like to expand your comment and make it into an answer? | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 10:02 | comment | added | 410 gone | NB the article's claim is not about DNA generally, but about mitochondrial DNA specifically. Indeed, the article explicitly states that the Y-chromosome evidence goes in the other direction. | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 8:59 | comment | added | Jamiec♦ | Ok, just checking - sometimes people barely understand the differences (including me - and I'm a member of one of those clubs! ;) | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 8:42 | history | edited | Graviton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 44 characters in body
|
Sep 16, 2015 at 8:36 | history | edited | Graviton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 122 characters in body
|
Sep 16, 2015 at 8:35 | comment | added | Graviton | @Jamiec, no, of course not. I mean "people who descend from Jews who left Israel & Middle East some 2000 years ago" | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 8:20 | comment | added | Jamiec♦ | Where you've asked about "Semitic" did you mean Sephardic? | |
Sep 16, 2015 at 5:44 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Context
|
Sep 16, 2015 at 3:19 | history | asked | Graviton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |