Skip to main content
Skeptics

Return to Question

edited title
Link
Mad Scientist ♦
Mad Scientist ♦
  • 43.7k
  • 20
  • 174
  • 192

Would humans really be more advanced if the Dark Ages never happened?

Spel checked 'effected' into 'affected'
Source Link
edit approved Jun 2, 2011 at 1:41
Gustavo Mori
edit approved Jun 2, 2011 at 1:41
Gustavo Mori
  • 352
  • 1
  • 2
  • 12

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting ~1about 1,000 years, set humans back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only effectedaffected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldntwouldn't make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting ~1,000 years, set humans back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only effected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldnt make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting about 1,000 years, set humans back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only affected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldn't make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

explained 'us' and 'we'
Source Link
James
James
  • 367
  • 1
  • 3
  • 5

Would wehumans really be more advanced if the Dark Ages never happened?

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting ~1,000 years, set ushumans back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only effected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldnt make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

Would we really be more advanced if the Dark Ages never happened?

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting ~1,000 years, set us back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only effected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldnt make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

Would humans really be more advanced if the Dark Ages never happened?

So there are a lot of people who say that the Dark Ages, lasting ~1,000 years, set humans back technologically.

However, some say that since the Dark Ages really only effected Western Europe, and not the Middle East or Asia, it wouldnt make a difference.

Is there research to backup either claim?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/66022161869045760
Source Link
James
James
  • 367
  • 1
  • 3
  • 5