Timeline for Does US Intelligence have built-in interfaces in major social networking sites that allow them to browse personal information at will?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2015 at 22:34 | history | edited | Sklivvz |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 23, 2012 at 23:50 | answer | added | Kristoffer Nolgren | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 2, 2011 at 21:43 | comment | added | Sklivvz | Related: info.publicintelligence.net/Facebook2010.pdf | |
| May 2, 2011 at 17:36 | comment | added | Rex Kerr | It is entirely possible, given Assange's technical skill, that he may have found said interface(s). It is also entirely possible, given the nature of Wikileaks, that Assange may have had highly reliable information passed to him indicating these things. Thus, this may be neither verifiable nor "just guess-work". | |
| May 2, 2011 at 17:21 | comment | added | Sklivvz | Related schneier.com/essay-306.html | |
| May 2, 2011 at 16:02 | comment | added | user5341 | @Sklivvz - I don't know what he implies. I'm not able to read his mind, and the interview doesn't say so anywhere. | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:54 | comment | added | Sklivvz | What he implies is something similar to: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy but for all major social networking sites. Bypassing privacy settings and accessing any kind of information without warrant. | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:47 | comment | added | user5341 | @Sklivvaz - I read. He never specifies whether he means "bypassing provacy settings" or not. Let me clarify my question - does the claim apply to information NOT available (on a level of individual user) to a random developer via an API? | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:43 | answer | added | user5341 | timeline score: 9 | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:41 | comment | added | Sklivvz | At will = without subpoena, etc. Read the article, the claim is quite precise. | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:40 | comment | added | Sklivvz | @frank: thanks for the edit - I've approved it (but if you can think of a 1-line title it's better) | |
| May 2, 2011 at 15:40 | comment | added | user5341 | Also, please calrify "at will". Do you mean "bypassing privacy settings"? | |
| S May 2, 2011 at 15:39 | history | suggested | frankodwyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed subjective headline to the actual question
|
| May 2, 2011 at 15:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 2, 2011 at 15:39 | |||||
| May 2, 2011 at 15:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/65070872469311488 | ||
| May 2, 2011 at 15:04 | history | asked | Sklivvz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |