Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 5, 2013 at 11:32 comment added gerrit Note that the figure relates to attributable casualties. The total number of casualties impossible to determine. See also the discussion in the comments for @Ardesco's answer.
Apr 25, 2011 at 1:54 vote accept Kit Sunde
Apr 14, 2011 at 8:18 comment added MSalters Even if we'd assume that there was a IAEA-induced bias, in which direction would it be? The IAEA isn't exactly a fan of the RBMK design.
Apr 12, 2011 at 18:46 comment added StaxMan I would consider WHO reports rather objective, and have never heard evidence or credible suggestions that IAEA or other organizations would have tried to exert their influence. But since it is impossible to prove non-existence of something, what would make sense is to point to some actual credible suggestions there has been coercion; or, assume there is none.
Apr 12, 2011 at 17:49 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' How reliable is the WHO figure, though? Under WHO's agreement with IAEA, while IAEA has no formal say in what WHO does, there is mandatory cooperation. So how do we have confidence that their reports are unbiased? Are there completely independent studies?
Apr 12, 2011 at 15:22 comment added Kostya "... experience was traumatic and left many with no employment and a belief that they have no place in society" -- I feel that this argument is really dragged in. This was the last years of Soviet. And a lot of people felt that way. Especially those who had any personal problems so they could clearly see that the system doesn't care about them.
Apr 12, 2011 at 12:20 comment added Lennart Regebro The "is expected" part means this isn't an answer to the question.
Apr 12, 2011 at 12:03 comment added Konrad Rudolph “Even when people were compensated for losses” – it should be noted that most weren’t.
Apr 12, 2011 at 10:06 history edited Oliver_C CC BY-SA 3.0
added more text
Apr 12, 2011 at 9:37 history answered Oliver_C CC BY-SA 3.0