Timeline for Is an imminent volcanic eruption the most plausible explanation for the Yellowstone animal exodus?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 28, 2014 at 18:51 | answer | added | 497362 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 14:37 | comment | added | Brian S | FWIW, even if Yellowstone does erupt in the near future, I doubt any fleeing animals would make it a sufficient distance to survive. | |
| Apr 12, 2014 at 23:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 19, 2014 at 3:05 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2014 at 22:41 | comment | added | Flimzy | @MarkHurd: I would say so, and have voted accordingly. | |
| Apr 12, 2014 at 4:06 | comment | added | Mark Hurd | @Flimzy and so now that that question has an answer, is this one a duplicate, or effectively so? | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 5:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/454486513502674944 | ||
| Apr 10, 2014 at 21:26 | comment | added | Flimzy | @msmucker0527: Fair enough. It is done. | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 21:01 | comment | added | msmucker0527 | Shouldn't we start with the question, "Are the animals fleeing Yellowstone National Park?"? | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 18:47 | comment | added | user5582 | What I meant was that he's not allowing even for explanations like "it's just a coincidence", or that the phenomenon is not actually happening, or "animals just do this for reasons unrelated to earthquakes". His claim is that these are not possible explanations, not simply that they're less likely... regardless, I don't think this changes the answer that will come from this. Just wanted to point out that Thomas's claim is quite strong. | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 18:40 | comment | added | Flimzy | @Articuno: Yes, I realize that, but I'm sure he doesn't mean that literally. He's smart enough to know that someone could claim extra-terrestrial mind-control over the animals, but he considers such a claim--along with all others--to be so implausible as to be discounted entirely. So I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. :) | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 18:32 | comment | added | user5582 | Note: the claim you've quoted is even stronger... Thomas is saying this is the only possible explanation. | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 18:11 | history | asked | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |