4 The claims are not made by the IDF or any other official Israel source but by a site which is not an official site of the Israeli gov.
source | link

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claimThis site claims that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every combatant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF'sthat statement is accurate?

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every combatant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement is accurate?

This site claims that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every combatant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether that statement is accurate?

3 militant --> combatant
source | link

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every militantcombatant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement is accurate?

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every militant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement is accurate?

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every combatant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths).

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred.

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement is accurate?

    Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/296921769254719488
2 Extracted claim. Defined terms. Removed extraneous claims about Israel.
source | link

Is the Civilian:Militant Death Ratiothe "civilian casualty ratio" in Warmodern day warfare about 3-4:1?

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) IDFclaim claims that, in warmodern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every militant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast LeadOperation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of DefenseOperation Pillar of Defense, in which the Civilian:Militant deathcivilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i. They use the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as examples of the average Civilian:Militant death ratioe. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths). 

Though Israel is a transparent, egalitarian democracy, manyMany would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. AndAlso, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred. 

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement wasis accurate and, if so, over what period?

Is the Civilian:Militant Death Ratio in War 3:1?

The IDF claims that, in war, about 3 civilians are killed for every militant killed. They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the Civilian:Militant death ratio was about 1:1. They use the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as examples of the average Civilian:Militant death ratio.

Though Israel is a transparent, egalitarian democracy, many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. And I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred. Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement was accurate and, if so, over what period?

Is the the "civilian casualty ratio" in modern day warfare about 3-4:1?

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claim that, in modern warfare, about 3 civilians are killed for every militant killed.

This concept can be scientifically proven by understand (sic) the basic concept of “civilian casualty ratio”, that is in every conflict you need to look at the number of civilian causalities versus the number of combatant causalities. This ratio obviously differs from conflict to conflict, but the average in modern day warfare is between 3-4:1. Estimated ratios in NATO operations in Afghanistan were 3:1, western campaigns in Iraq and Kosovo were believed to be 4:1, and the conflicts in Chechnya and Serbia were much higher than 4:1. That is to say that for each combatant that is killed 3-4 or more civilians are killed.

They then compare this statistic favorably to Operation Cast Lead and Operation Pillar of Defense, in which the civilian casualty ratio was about 1:1 (i.e. much more focussed on avoiding civilian deaths). 

Many would reasonably object to the use of an IDF source to defend the IDF. Also, I had a bit of trouble finding the specific UN statement to which they referred. 

Can anybody here please determine whether the IDF's statement is accurate?

1
source | link