According to About.com
The total biomass of all the ants on Earth is roughly equal to the total biomass of all the people on Earth.
Is the above statement just a myth or its in fact real? Are there any hard facts to prove this?
|
According to About.com
Is the above statement just a myth or its in fact real? Are there any hard facts to prove this? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Ants drastically outweigh us If it's good enough for you, the first sentence of Ted Shultz, "In Search of Ant Ancestors," PNAS, December 19, 2000 vol. 97 no. 26, 14028-14029:
He gives no reference to a primary source, and that's the closest I can find to a solid reference via the Internet. PNAS is one of the most prestigious journals in the United States, so I think we can trust peer review not to let the opening sentence of a paper be boloney (knock on wood!). The most likely book I can think of to contain an authoritative discussion is Wilson's The Ants (1990). I don't have it on hand, but it won a Pulitzer, so it's available at many libraries. One part field guide, one part textbook -- if you're interested in ants you should definitely check it out sometime :). See this table on Wikipedia if you want to pursue more details on human biomass vs. other species. Hard numbers are of course hard to pin down, but the gist is that ants probably outweigh us by an order of magnitude, and termites and krill compete with them for first place. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
An article recently published by the BBC debunks this myth: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29281253
The article there also points out that nobody really knows the actual number of ants in the world:
Coupled with the fact that Wilson and Hoelldobler's own calculation is wrong:
It doesn't seem to hold true that this idea holds any weight. However it was possibly true at one point in history:
|
|||
|
|