Take the 2-minute tour ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This "random fact" has been going on for a few days and no one seems to know it's source or if it's supported by any reliable research. If the research does exist I'd be much interested in checking what's the criteria to measure beauty.

"Did you know that our brain makes us see ourselves 5x more beautiful than we really are?"

"Did you know that our brain makes us see ourselves 5x more beautiful than we really are?"

share|improve this question
No, we look exactly 6.5432 times more beautiful :-) –  Sklivvz Jan 7 '12 at 0:08
I am instantly skeptical of any claim that applies a quantitative value like "five times" to a qualitative measure like "beauty". I mean, really five times? Not four time? Not Sklivvz' 6.5432 times? –  dmckee Jan 7 '12 at 0:44
This question and answer is getting a lot of views, but not many (up or down) votes. Let people know what you think. –  Oddthinking Jul 9 '12 at 12:21
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 11 down vote accepted

As has been pointed out in the comment above, the specific claim that we see ourselves as exactly five times more attractive is a little absurd. There are no units measuring beauty, that I am aware of.

In social sciences, when the attractiveness of an individual has to be rated, it is rated on a scale where, for example, one would mean low attractiveness and five high attractiveness. Under such scales, everyone in the study would literally have to be of a 5/5 attractiveness and yet rate themselves as a 1/5 attractiveness. That's highly unlikely, to say the least. Thus, I'm inclined to dismiss the notion that we see ourselves five times more attractive than we are as bogus.

Leaving at that, however, is leaving much unanswered. There is, I think, a vaguer but still quite interesting claim to investigate: Do we overestimate our own attractiveness?

That question has an answer, and the answer is yes.

According to the authors of The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us, relating the findings of Narcissistic Illusions in Self-Evaluations of Intelligence and Attractiveness,

Evidence about self-judged attractiveness comes from a study of college students in which men judged themselves to be about 15 percent more attractive than they actually were. Women viewed themselves as slightly less attractive than they actually were, although both men and women viewed themselves as above average in attractiveness (the women in the study were judged to be a little more above average in attractiveness).

The study itself is unfortunately locked behind a paywall, but the abstract does support this:

Both males and females overestimated their own intelligence, with males, but not females, also overestimating their attractiveness. ... Males showed greater positive illusions than females, with this effect at least partly attributable to observed gender differences in narcissism

The theory that we overestimate our own beauty is supported by another study: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Enhancement in Self-Recognition.

Researchers took photos of undergraduate students and then invited those students back to the laboratory two to four weeks later to identify their face out of an assortment of eleven images. Out of those eleven pictures, five were altered to make the subject less attractive than the original and five were altered to make the subject more attractive. The eleventh one was the original, unaltered picture

The result? The majority of participants picked one of the pictures that was altered to be more attractive than the original picture, overestimating the attractiveness by six to twelve percent.

The researchers then did a similar experiment, but this time they asked the participants to evaluate friends and strangers, in order to see if we also overestimate other people's attractiveness or only our own. In the end, subjects overestimated their friend's attractiveness but not the stranger's.

TL;DR: We do overestimate our own beauty, but not by anything close to a magnitude of five times.

share|improve this answer
"There are no units measuring beauty" There's an old joke that the SI unit of beauty is millihelen and is defined as the amount of beauty required to launch a single ship. –  dmckee Jan 9 '12 at 1:00
"Women viewed themselves as slightly less attractive than they actually were" so, for women the answer is no? Note that the individual in the picture is clearly female... :-) –  Sklivvz Jan 9 '12 at 7:45
@Sklivvz: Possibly. In the second studies, they didn't differentiate people by gender. Instead, they tried to correlate the effect with explicit and implicit self-esteem. The correlation was positive. In the first study, they correlated it with narcissism and said that male were more narcissistic. –  Borror0 Jan 9 '12 at 13:27
@Sklivvz - I Think that is the point of the comic - Some women(and men) are not overconfident and percieve themselves as less attractive than others percieve them. So a statistic like that would make them feel worse. And the fact that such a claim is at best unrealistic is part of the joke... –  Chad Jan 9 '12 at 17:04
add comment

protected by Sklivvz Jan 9 '12 at 15:53

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.