Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

NASA satellite image of the Suez Canal

The Oera Linda Book, an alleged ancient manuscript that is generally considered to be a hoax, claims that at some time around 1600 BCE an earthquake closed off a strait that existed where the Suez Canal is now.

Soon after they had left the harbour they fell in with at least thirty ships coming from Tyre with women and children. They were on their way to Athens, but when they heard how things stood there they went with Geert. The sea-king of the Tyrians brought them altogether through the strait which at that time ran into the Red Sea (now re-established as the Suez Canal). At last they landed at the Punjab, called in our language the Five Rivers, because five rivers flow together to the sea. Here they settled, and called it Geertmania. The King of Tyre afterwards, seeing that all his best sailors were gone, sent all his ships with his wild soldiers to catch them, dead or alive. When they arrived at the strait, both the sea and the earth trembled. The land was upheaved so that all the water ran out of the strait, and the muddy shores were raised up like a rampart. This happened on account of the virtues of the Geertmen, as every one can plainly understand.

The Suez Canal article on wikipedia indicates that there is evidence of attempts to dig canals between the Nile River and the Red Sea at about that time but makes no mention of catastrophic geological events opening or closing a connection between the Mediterranean and Red seas.

Is there any evidence that such a passage existed during human history that was the result of natural events rather than human undertaking?

(*NASA satellite image of the Suez Canal is in the public domain and hosted by wikimedia commons.)

share|improve this question
8  
Yes, the Mediterranean sea and Red sea were always connected via the Atlantic and Indian ocean. – Tomas Sep 15 '11 at 19:50
1  
There have indeed been attempts to dig earlier canals, all of which failed and were abandoned. If there had been a natural connection, those attempts would not have been necessary :) and neither would the caravans across the desert to transport goods. – jwenting Sep 16 '11 at 7:29
Is the hoax document the only source of the claim? Then it lacks notability. If no-one believes it is true, there is little point to debunking it (assuming it is false). – Oddthinking Dec 8 '12 at 4:43

closed as too localized by Oddthinking, Rory Alsop, Sklivvz Dec 10 '12 at 23:01

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, see the FAQ.