Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's a commonly stated belief that no one can fold a piece of paper in half after doing so seven times. Even I have been unable to fold a piece of normal paper for an 8th time.

Is this true for normal (A4/newspaper) sized-paper?

I would also be interested to know if this is this an absolute rule, or would a sufficiently large piece of paper be foldable more than seven times?

share|improve this question
Define normal. Isn't newspaper paper normal? Airpost? – user unknown Aug 24 '11 at 3:30
mythbusters covered this one. However, the clip I found uses a massive sheet – Monkey Tuesday Aug 24 '11 at 3:46
I got to 9 (using extra thin A4 paper) so this is officially BUSTED. – Konrad Rudolph Aug 24 '11 at 15:32
You also need to define if all the folds have to be in the same direction. I have taken an 8.5" x 11" piece of paper, folded it 5-6 times in one direction (along the longer axis, i.e. left-to-right), then was able to fold it 3-4 more times along the shorter (although now longer) axis, i.e. up-to-down. – fred Aug 24 '11 at 18:17
People interested in origami find this statement outright hilarious :) – user288 Aug 24 '11 at 22:40
up vote 42 down vote accepted

No, it is not true for all scenarios.

This idea was examined by Britney Gallivan, who came up with a mathematical model for the limits, and used this knowledge to fold a large piece of paper twelve times in January 2002.

She was a junior in high school at the time.

Reference: Historical Society of Pomona Valley

According to the above reference, the upper-bound equation for "Alternate Direction Folding", which I understand to be the normal style, is


Without LaTeX, this looks like:

W = πt.2^(3(n-1)/2)

Solve for n, we get:

n = 1 + 2/3.log2 (W/πt)

Plugging in the values for standard A4 80 g/m² office copy paper (W=297mm, t=0.105mm) we get:

n = 1 + 2/3.log2(297/(0.105π))

n = 7.543


  • The equation works with square paper, and I have used A4's longest side, perhaps overestimating the number of folds by a fraction.
  • The thickness of 80 g/m² was interpolated from the chart on cited page.
  • Pi looks like this, in this font: π

If the original formula calculated by Gallivan is correct, this shows that a standard piece of copy paper, even if it is extended a little, cannot be folded 8 times.

share|improve this answer
I particularly like this answer because a secondary school student figured it out and provided an answer that included a mathematical model. (I hope this helps encourage more younger people to engage in scientific thinking.) – Randolf Richardson Aug 24 '11 at 4:39
for A4 it may well be true, iirc to get more folds you need a very long thin piece of paper such as toilet paper – jk. Aug 24 '11 at 8:19
@jk - here is supersized to 11 from mythbusters. – Daniel Iankov Aug 24 '11 at 8:51
It's important to note that Ms. Gallivan foled a very large sheet of paper. Since the OP asked for a A4 sized paper, your answer could be improved by saying how many times that sheet of paper can be folded by using the model you cite. – Borror0 Aug 24 '11 at 15:11
Questions also mentions "newspaper size". Newspapers are printed on much thinner paper ( between 40 g/m2 and 57 g/m2), full sized newspaper sheet is 24"x36" (already folded once, containing 4 pages of newspaper). Result for above formula for 40g/m2 24x36" sheet is 9.26 – vartec Aug 27 '11 at 21:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.