I have heard many women say that they like taller men. As a possible explanation I heard that they feel more secure with a taller men than a shorter one.

Do women tend to prefer men who are tall, men who are taller than themselves, or is there no relation?

link|improve this question
2  
presumably, a taller man than the woman is? – Thursagen Jun 8 '11 at 22:10
@Ham, I edited to clarify. – Oddthinking Jun 9 '11 at 6:21
1  
1  
That would explain why Snookie is so promiscuous. All men are taller than her. – JohnFx Jun 11 '11 at 2:58
I wanted to ask does women prefer richer males but I got the feeling that it'll be off topic somehow. – Jim Thio Feb 28 at 2:42
show 1 more comment
feedback

2 Answers

Based on the Wikipedia page on Physical Attractiveness, which is well referenced, this is true. Note however that it also says there that

While women usually desire men to be at least the same height as themselves or taller, several other factors also determine male attractiveness, and the male-taller norm is not universal. In certain non-Western cultures, the relative heights of partners have been shown to be irrelevant in their choice of mate, which suggests that Western height preferences may be sociocultural, rather than genetic, in nature. Professor Adam Eyre-Walker, from the University of Sussex, stated that there is, as yet, no evidence that these preferences are evolutionary preferences, as opposed to merely cultural preferences.

link|improve this answer
Can you dig in a little deeper: what do the references say? – Sklivvz Mar 26 at 6:57
feedback

Bearing in mind taller men are on average more successful, it's probably fair to say that evolution would by now have biased women to prefer taller men.

It's not necessary to examine all the individual reasons why tall men do better, or cite specific successful tall men - the evolutionary record tells us that on average humans have been getting taller. So I must just cite one individual - 'Lucy', a hominid skeleton dated to be more than 3 million years old - who was barely a metre tall. I know it's commonly held that Turkana Boy might have grown to 6' 1" if he'd reached adulthood, but he died at 5' 3", and later studies say he'd only have been likely to grow another 2"-5".

There will obviously have been many points in the history of hominid evolution when it was a positive disadvantage to be large/tall (when food was scarce, for example). So we're not looking at a slow, steady increase here. But the genes for height have been consistently preserved, probably largely through sexual selection by females. To the extent that "fitter" females get more choice of mate, they tend to choose taller men. And thus have taller children - who have more chance of surviving because their parents are better than average providers.

Since we now have money, women can use a man's wealth as an even more accurate indicator of his fitness as a mate, but height remains a powerful influence.

link|improve this answer
4  
Your argument relies on speculation - especially the proposition that tallness evolved due to sexual selection (and not other forms of selection). That begs the question. – Oddthinking Mar 22 at 3:59
@Oddthinking♦: It's not "speculation" that taller men are on average more successful, as the answer in the link shows. Do I seriously need to provide evidence that on average humans have been getting taller? Or to provide evidence that in a social species like h. sap., sexual selection is always a powerful factor? I don't think I can be bothered, frankly. You are running something of a cliquey "closed shop" here. – FumbleFingers Mar 29 at 21:48
Do you need to provide such evidence? Of course! But more importantly, you need to address the bit I complained about. If I show evidence that Americans are getting more obese, and that sexual selection is powerful, can I conclude that US women prefer obese men? No, that would be speculation. Replace "obese" with "tall" and we have your argument. Feel free to raise the "closed shop" issue in meta, but I respectfully suggest you'd better show evidence if you want to convince people. – Oddthinking Mar 30 at 0:03
@Oddthinking♦: Most Americans who become obese do so in middle age, by which time they've partnered up and reproduced, so sexual selection is irrelevant by then. In less well-nourished environments (sub-Saharan Africa, for example) I'd bet any money evidence could be produced to show that women there do (or at least did) prefer heavier men. But I'm not going to look for it. You're obviously set in your position, and don't like the implications of my view. – FumbleFingers Mar 30 at 22:46
I fear we are headed towards farce here. Let's turn back! You have shot down an position I don't hold, BUT you haven't shot down its analogy with your argument, so you have just equally shot down your own argument. Also, I believe your conclusion is true (certainly in the cultures I've been exposed to most), but your argument to get there is unsound, so sorry, the implications are not the issue. – Oddthinking Mar 30 at 23:26
show 3 more comments
feedback

This post does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.