Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I read an article years ago about the Vatican City going bankrupt and subsequently being bailed out by the CEO of a large sneaker company (Nike, Adidas or Reebok, etc. - I can't remember which). I recall this happened in the 1980's. Is this true, and if so what actually happend?

EDIT:

I've dug up some articles that indicate that the Vatican was indeed impoverished, but no articles indicating an insolvency or bankruptcy.

Here's an article from 1991 that implies a potential looming bankruptcy: POPE ASKS CATHOLICS FOR FINANCIAL BAILOUT, Date: April 15, 1991, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Here's another article from the Youngstown Vindicator dated August 13th, 1979, entitled "Funerals and Conclaves throw Vatican More Deeply into Debt", which states "... the most serious problem with the Vatican is ... poverty. The Vatican does not have enough money to meet its expenses."

If indeed the Vatican was in financial hardship as far back as 1979 through 1991, it stands to reason that there was a period of some insolvency or debt restructuring. I remember this being a "big deal" at the time, so I'm somewhat surprised that there are no references to it.

EDIT:

It seems I have confused the Vatican City with the Vatican Bank.

Here's a quote from the Wikipedia article Institute for Works of Religion (the Vatican Bank):

The [Vatican Bank] was involved in a major political and financial scandal in the 1980s, concerning the 1982 $3.5 billion collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, of which it was a major shareholder. The head of IOR from 1971 to 1989, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, was under consideration for indictment in 1982 in Italy as an accessory of the bankruptcy; however, he was never brought to trial due to the Italian courts' ruling that the priest, being a high-ranking prelate of the Vatican, had diplomatic immunity from prosecution.

So for the purpose of this question, let's take it that the "Vatican" went through financial catastrophe. The question then becomes: Was the Vatican Bank bailed out by the CEO of a large sneaker company (or other such philanthropist)?

share|improve this question
18  
That's essentially the plot of Godfather III – Chris Cudmore May 12 '11 at 16:03
2  
Considering the vast amounts of assets the Vatican owns, it sounds a bit far-fetched. – Zano Jun 17 '11 at 23:29
Vatican has many assets but they are not exactly liquid. I think many of Vatican assets are solid as a rock, I can't imagine anyone buying vatican city. But they could possibly consider telling the Pope to get a real job. – Craig Jul 14 '11 at 3:09
5  
Compulsory George Carlin quote: "He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He's all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can't handle money!" – nico Aug 13 '11 at 14:10

1 Answer

The vatican only this year, returned to profitability and has been in debt for a few years. As an aside, doesn't anyone else find it weird they're talking profitability? Apparently, they returned to the black to the tune of 300m

Vatican returns to black

Peters pence down 15m

share|improve this answer
"doesn't anyone else find it weird they're talking profitability? " Not really, huge swaths of European history have turned on the Church needing (or wanting) money. – dmckee Aug 13 '11 at 13:56
6  
I think the terms used should be running a surplus or deficit rather than profit an loss. There is no problem in running a surplus as every operation needs to have reserve capital that can be drawn on at a future point. It would be financially imprudent to run with zero margins. – Rincewind42 Aug 16 '11 at 8:03
There's a term for organizations, of any kind, that always run in the red. Bankrupt – Russell Steen Sep 14 '11 at 5:18

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.