Looking at the side of any diet soda, you can see 0 calories, 0 fat, 0 sugar, and tons more zeros.
Does this mean that diet sodas are actually somewhat HEALTHY? Or at least not at all bad for you?
|
Looking at the side of any diet soda, you can see 0 calories, 0 fat, 0 sugar, and tons more zeros. Does this mean that diet sodas are actually somewhat HEALTHY? Or at least not at all bad for you? |
|||||||||||
|
|
In diet soda you typically have carbonated water, caramel colour, aspartame, phosphoric acid, potassium benzoate, flavouring, citric acid, and caffeine. These are generally non-nutritive, but as with most food products, their health effects are variously under dispute or active research. According to reason, pure water is quite simply lower risk than diet soda, but there's been significant research into the health effects of the latter, with negative effects occurring largely via the psychological and biological trickery of artificial sweeteners. Further reading:
|
|||||
|
|
Diet soda is, among other things, positively associated with type 2 diabetes. Artificially-sweetened carbonated drinks seem to make one hungrier, which does not bode well for weight control. Since people tend to be resistant to making sizable dietary changes for long periods of time as part of a study, it's hard to really nail these things down definitively, but the evidence does not indicate at this point that diet sodas are "not at all bad for you". (An exception is if you're traveling or living in a country with an unsafe water supply.) |
|||
|
|