This is a common prejudice in my social environment, but is it true?
Are educated people more likely to vote for a social/left wing party?
|show 12 more comments|
If we do restrict ourselves to people who were mostly educated in the West?
There, there is some correlation at postgraduate level, and no correlation at all below it, but nowhere as strong as a typical "common prejudice" among liberals would have you believe. Stolen shamelessly from Sven Clement's Politics.SE answer, NY Times demo breakdown from 2012 election exit polls shows:
Note that while Postgraduates did break for Obama, they did not do so in an overwhelming manner - 42% postgrads voted "R"; and people with a college degree voted "R" at slightly over 50%.
In my defense of stealing, I contributed significantly to helping format that answer :)
Even more significantly, "education" by itself doesn't mean much without taking a major/concentration into account. Courtesty of SamIAm's answer on Politics.SE:
In addition, merely "a level of education" does NOT make one vote for a social/left wing party. There's a correlation (see the second part of the answer) with "education obtained at liberal-leaning Western universities", but not "a level of education" per se.
A very clear experiment showing this to be true has been historically run in USA since 1990s, with a large demographics of highly educated people who have NOT been subjected to Western universities immigrated to USA, as part of 4th wave of Russian/Soviet emigration.
Let's see how that demographic breaks out:
This clearly shows that mere "level of education" is in no way predictive of political leanings, although the source of education is a different story.
|show 11 more comments|
I've heard the claim often myself, but it is not easy to find any backing research or statistics and I would assume that there will be great variations in the answers, depending on which country or geographic region you look at.
I managed to find statistics from the last parliament election in Norway (2009), where voter's education and political preference is examined closer. The relevant data is found in the second block of table A.1, page 28 (Utdanning).
The level of education has been split into three groups:
The political parties (R, SV, Ap, ..., H, FrP, Andre = others) are roughly arranged from left to right in the same order you would arrange them on a political left/right wing scale.
If we first take a look at the most leftish and rightish parties, your claim first seem to be backed up by the statistics. At the far-left, we find The Red Party (R) and the Socialist Left Party (SV) with a much higher support among the better educated voters (0/1/2% and 4/5/12% for the three education level groups). At the far right, we find the Progress Party (FrP) with a much higher support among the less educated voters (31/26/9%).
If we however look at the two larger "traditional" left/right wing parties in Norway, the Labour Party (Ap) and the Conservative Party (H), the distribution is opposite (46/35/32% for the Labour Party and 7/17/27% for the Conservative Party).
The last three parties, the Liberal Party (V), the Christian Democratic Party (KrF) and the Centre Party (Sp) are usually categorized as centrist parties without any clear left/right wing classification.
If we group the parties as well in left wing (R, SV, Ap), centrist (V, KrF, Sp) and right wing (H, FrP), the support cross-referenced with the education level group adds up to 50/41/46% (left wing), 11/16/18% (centrist) and 38/43/36% (right wing). Even if these numbers indicate a slight skew in one or another direction, they can at least not be used to backup your original claim. If at all, they seem to indicate the well-educated people tend to prefer centrist parties.
The simple answer is: no they don't
Andrew Gelman has addressed this issue several times in his blog and his book Red State, Blue State, also has a lot of related electoral statistics.
He gives a more detailed answer in another post (where he was addressing the sort of inverse fallacy that educated people are a liberal elite that vote democrat):
These charts clarify some of the patterns:
The key point here is that even the poor uneducated are more likely to vote democrat. Education may have some tendency to make people more democrat-voting, but this pattern is dominated by wealth, where the wealthy are much more likely to vote republican. Education makes you more democrat-leaning; wealth makes you more republican. But, while postgraduates may be more strongly democrat, the working classes (defined by education and wealth) are not a republican block.
As comments have raised this issue is different in different countries. The following chart (also based on Andrew Gelman's analysis) summarises the situation for many. The chart y-axis is the difference between rich and poor conservative vote share (that is, the higher up the axis the larger the conservative voting is skewed to the rich). The US shows the most pronounced tendency for the rich to be more conservative than the poor, but it is far from alone.
In addition to TL;DR:'s numbers, ARAcontent list about 25% of graduate degrees are in education (170K out of 700K) - those are going overwhelmingly liberal. And about 20% MBA's (150K out of 700K) - those are going conservative, but much less powerfully so. ARAcontent is renamed since the 2010 article in Ozark County Times. I added the 77K professional/doc degrees to the 605K Masters. That's only two years, and I'm sure there are trends, but that breakdown is a start. You will note that Education grad students have considerably lower GRE's.
Most uneducated people care very little about politics
As far as assuming that educated people vote and care about politics: This varies depending on geographic location
Written from personal experience living in Chicago(very liberal) and Mississippi(very Conservative).
Personally I don't align myself with other party - I tend to be liberal on social issues and conservative on economical/fiscal policy and issues.
Chicago: I've found that most uneducated people here are liberals. Chicago's west side is extremely violent, embracing a gang banging culture. It is also mostly black, although there are some white people and Spanish people too they make up a small minority. These uneducated people tend to be liberal. They simply like Obama because he is 'black'.
Chicago has a small minority of republicans and has traditionally been extremely liberal. I would venture to say that you would have a hard time finding an uneducated republican and here is my explanation for that: liberals here tend to think that conservatives are stupid, unintelligent, racist, and politically incorrect. Sadly this is an extremely prejudiced view that is shared amongst black community members here. Uneducated people are less likely to think freely and are more likely to go with the general swing of things, thus it is unlikely that they would do any independent research into the messages and principles behind both political parties.
*Mississippi(Jackson): * *Would it surprise you if I told you that evolution is not widely taught in Mississippi schools and the story of creation is widely taught as truth?*
I found this to be extremely surprising - pretty much everybody I met from Mississippi told me that their grade school and high school's taught the story of creation. I think we can safely say that if creation is being taught in schools it is likely that even the lightly educated people can be considered uneducated.
Anyway, it seemed to be the opposite in Mississippi.
This post does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.