Take the 2-minute tour ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We often hear the claim that men are treated unfairly in relation to women by the Judicial System.

One example of the claim can be found here.

The article claims that:

Women shoplifters were less likely than comparable males to receive a prison sentence. They were also more likely to be sentenced to a community penalty or to be discharged....

Men and women stood an equal chance of going to prison for a first violent offence. However among repeat offenders women were less likely to receive a custodial sentence.

Women first offenders were significantly less likely than equivalent men to receive a prison sentence for a drug offence, but recidivists were equally likely to go to prison.

Among first and repeat offenders, women convicted of violence and drug offences were always more likely to be discharged and men more likely to be fined.

In addition, the data of the UK Criminal Justice System, which is detailed and broken down in several different categories, seems to also imply prejudice. Specifically, women are arrested in 18% of the cases, but convicted only in 6% of the cases, or men are 3 times more likely to be get convicted, in relation to their arrests.

So my question is: Are men actually treated unequally wrt women by the judicial system. Is there prejudice against men?

If there are any other sources that could confirm/contradict the claim, they are welcome.

Thanx

share|improve this question
    
1  
Please cite an example of the claim. –  Oddthinking Jan 3 '13 at 0:45
    
Ok correlation is not causation. But I compare the gender proportions in arrests and in convictions, and they are different. Can we simply dismiss the claim until we find what the cause of the difference is? –  voth Jan 3 '13 at 0:47
    
@Oddthinking Is this good enough? Or do we need a scientific publication? –  voth Jan 3 '13 at 0:50
    
@voth: You certainly don't need a scientific publication, no. This is a good source of claims. The trouble is, it doesn't really tie in with the data you quote. (e.g. it suggest men are 9 times more likely to commit murder than women, so there is little surprise that more men are in prison than women.) I suggest you pick one of the claims in that paper, quote it explicitly, and drop the stats you are currently quoting. –  Oddthinking Jan 3 '13 at 1:04
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

The criminal justice system does treat men more harshly than women, at least as far as sentencing decisions are concerned.

Source - The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts

Using data compiled by the United States Sentencing Commission, we examine the independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing decisions in U.S. federal courts. We find that Hispanics and blacks, males, and younger defendants receive harsher sentences than whites, females, and older defendants after controlling for important legal and contextual factors.

The following table shows that women are around 42% less likely than men to be sent to jail and that women receive sentences that are approximately 25% shorter than men.

Table 2 shows the main effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on in/out and sentence length outcomes controlling for important legal factors and judicial district.

Table 2

While men are treated more harshly than women by criminal courts, this is not necessarily proof of bias. The authors state:

It is important to emphasize that we are not suggesting that these disparities necessarily result from a conscious or overt hostility toward certain defendant groups or that these disparities are even unwarranted.

...

we may be lacking relevant information that, if included in our models, would explain the racial/ ethnic, gender, and age disparities in our models. For example, women may be sentenced more leniently than men because they are, on average, more remorseful than men. If we have not adequately controlled for these gender differences in remorse in our models, then any apparent gender disparity may not be “real.”

share|improve this answer
    
thanx for the reply. I Couldn't upvote due to reputation :( . I also found this, which you could possibly include for a more complete answer. –  voth Jan 3 '13 at 12:40
1  
@voth You should be able now ;) –  Stefan Jan 3 '13 at 13:04
    
There are some interesting statistics on the MoJ website, but they haven't been controlled for various factors such as seriousness of offence and previous criminal history so may not be that useful. justice.gov.uk/statistics/criminal-justice/women –  Tom77 Jan 3 '13 at 13:34
    
I did not read the paper in sufficient detail, sorry, but I could not see how they controlled for violence. –  Oddthinking Jan 4 '13 at 13:08
3  
It is important to ... than men Or it could be that there is indeed a bias to treat women more favourably than men.. because of the women are wonderful psychology. There's a psychological (and physiological) reason women cry a lot more than men.. it triggers male sympathy. Just as children's crying trigger's mother's sympathy. Even female judges from early 1900's have noted that female-criminals evade punishment by triggering the sympathy of male juries. –  user11026 Jan 9 '13 at 20:26
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.