Take the 2-minute tour ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

An unsuspecting New Yorker was pushed onto the subway tracks earlier this week. He was killed by an oncoming train as he tried to pull himself onto the platform. An incident like this seems to occur almost every year in NYC. It can happen to any of us, and it can make just waiting for the train a frightful experience.

One NYC subway conductor said during a Reddit AMA that he knows the best way to survive a fall onto the tracks:

The best thing you can do is run as far down the platform as you can (in the opposite direction from where the train enters the station) and wave your arms frantically to get the train operator and passenger's attention. Believe me, the passengers WILL be doing the exact same thing, as nobody wants to see you get run over and their train get delayed.

If you can get to the far end of the platform, it gives the train more room to stop, and there is a ladder at the end of each platform where you can climb back up - do NOT try to climb up from where you are. So many people have been killed trying to jump back up rather than getting away from the entrance end of the station.

(Note: The conductor's responses are now deleted at Reddit. His response to this question can still be found at Jalopnik.)

Most New Yorkers would tell you to do otherwise. It's commonly believed that if you find yourself on the tracks, you should immediately crawl under the platform overhang and wait until the train passes. Several commenters express this opinion here. Unlike the conductor's advice, this conventional wisdom isn't dependent upon the proximity of the oncoming train -- you don't have to worry about outrunning a death machine.

So what's the right way to survive a fall into the subway?

New Yorkers want to know...

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Sklivvz Dec 4 '12 at 20:49

Questions on Skeptics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to scientific skepticism within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

if the train needs to stop at that station then running further than it will go see you survive –  ratchet freak Dec 4 '12 at 19:10
It would almost be nice to have a notable claim to the effect of there is no good way to survive then use the quote used here in an answer to that question. –  Chad Dec 4 '12 at 20:10
According to the FAQ, Skeptics StackExchange is for researching the evidence behind the claims you hear or read. This question doesn't appear to have any doubtful claims to investigate. Please edit it to reference a notable claim and flag for moderator attention to re-open (or get 5 re-open votes). –  Sklivvz Dec 4 '12 at 20:49
@Sklivvz - I added a counterclaim to shed doubt on the claim made by the conductor. Better? –  samthebrand Dec 4 '12 at 21:37
nbcnewyork.com/news/local/… –  samthebrand Dec 10 '12 at 4:29

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.