Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are a few videos on the internet that show long-range firing going almost deadly, when, supposedly, the shooter's own bullet ricochets at the target area, and comes flying back at the shooter.

Is it really possible?

share|improve this question
most target ranges are designed to prevent that... – ratchet freak Nov 14 '12 at 20:06
In that video you cannot really see if it's a bullet. Could be for example rock fragment from the target area. Also clearly it's trajectory a that point is anything but flat. – vartec Nov 14 '12 at 20:29

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Yes. Your own video shows it, and there are several others on YouTube that do. But for the sake of proving this...

Monan Jauhari, the Assistant directory of India's Central Forensic Science Laboratory wrote here about Bullet Ricochet from Metal Plates

When a bullet strikes a target of sufficient solidarity at low angle it may, while maintaining its integrity, be deflected from its original path as a result of impact and travel in a direction quite different from its original one. Such a deflection of a bullet constitutes a true ricochet

A real life example from earlier this year; A Texas teen was killed by a ricochet when he shot a butane tank.

When you shoot a solid target, the bullet can deflect. If the target is angled properly, it can deflect back at you.

share|improve this answer
additionally Mythbusters has also demonstrated a triple ricochet that can hit a shooter, though they deemed their bullet too slow to kill at that point. – Ryathal Nov 14 '12 at 21:44

While it's possible, it's unlikely to cause harm to the shooter, unless the shooter doesn't take simple and obvious safety steps.

What happened in the video is that the shooter shot with a .50 cal sniper rifle at a steel target located only 70 yard away from him, Which caused a part of the bullet to come back to him. However, the bullet didn't cause any harm to the shooter, or any damage to his ear muffs, source.

This type of firearm is designed to kill targets that are up to 2 km away from you, for example, the effective range of the Barrett M82 rifle is 1.8 km, the bullet that hit the man moved only 140 yards, yet it lost so much of its energy that it was harmless. The reason for it is that bullets are designed to cause maximum harm to their target by unleashing the maximum possible amount of energy to the target, in other words they are designed to not retain any energy after hitting the target (accept for AP bullets, that are designed to continue at the same trajectory, and not to turn back, by unleashing only the energy needed to pierce through, and then continuing, or all if piercing is impossible).

As can be seen in this photo:

photo

The ricocheting bullets are landing near the target it selt, even though they are fired from a relatively short distance (so they haven't lost much energy in their flight). The machine gun in the picture is an M2 Brouning, a .50 Caliber Machine Gun.

The problem arises when a person shoots a long range rifle at close range target that will "bounce" fragments of the bullet back, like steel or rubber. And while most of the energy is lost, it can still cause harm, if the shooter is standing nearby, like in this case.

The conclusion is to take caution, and as the first source says:

you should only shoot low-velocity rounds with soft lead or frangible bullets when shooting at relatively close range. ... Lesson learned–never underestimate the destructive power of rifle-launched projectiles.

share|improve this answer
Please edit your first sentence. You don't need to make a claim that injuries from a ricocheted bullet are only likely to occur based on someone's intelligence. – jdstankosky Nov 14 '12 at 22:09
@jdstankosky, I did edit it, but if a grown person is firing a military grade, high powered sniper rifle at a steel target located only 20 meters away from them, like in the last article, they have some very serious problems. – Ilya Melamed Nov 14 '12 at 22:19
I have seen shotgun pellets ricochet off a tree while hunting before and hit the shooter, which happened to be my father. Ricochets can happen when you don't pay attention to what is behind your target. They have nothing to do with your intelligence. – Chris Nov 14 '12 at 23:33
Also, in the video where the man fires the Barrett, the ricochet was only harmless because it was a glancing hit off his ear muffs. If it had been a direct hit to his face/body it would have not been so harmless. He was very lucky that the ricochet wasn't an inch or two to the right. – Chris Nov 14 '12 at 23:36
@Chris, a .50 caliber bullet at 140 yards away from the muzzle hit the ear muffs and didn't damage them, . A .50 BMG round can effectively disable a vehicle when fired into the engine block. If it is necessary to breach barriers, a .50 BMG round will penetrate most commercial brick walls and concrete cinder blocks, and yet, it didn't destroy a pair of plastic ear muffs. And the article describes a military grade bullet hitting a target after traveling 40 meters, and yet it had the power to only break bones. That's a very significant reduction in power and energy. – Ilya Melamed Nov 15 '12 at 0:24
show 4 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.