UFO theorists claim that there are US laws preventing people from investigating or contacting aliens.

From "Alien Contact Laws- $5,000 Fine And Imprisonment" at http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_223.shtml

Already Passed by Congress On October 5, 1982, Dr. Brain T. Clifford of the Pentagon announced at a press conference ("The Star", New York, Oct. 5, 1982) that contact between U.S. citizens and extra-terrestrials or their vehicles is strictly illegal. According to a law already on the books (Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations, adopted on July 16, 1969, before the Apollo moon shots), anyone guilty of such contact automatically becomes a wanted criminal to be jailed for one year and fined $5,000.

From "UFO theorists gain support abroad, but repression at home" at http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc598.htm we have this claim of censorship regulations:

If the US military is concerned about UFOs, it is not saying so publicly. Indeed, the French report chastises the United States for what it calls an ''impressive repressive arsenal'' on the subject, including a policy of disinformation and military regulations prohibiting public disclosure of UFO sightings.

Air Force Regulation 200-2, ''Unidentified Flying Objects Reporting,'' for example, prohibits the release to the public and the media of any data about ''those objects which are not explainable.'' An even more restrictive procedure is outlined in the Joint Army Navy Air Force Publication 146, which threatens to prosecute anyone under its jurisdiction - including pilots, civilian agencies, merchant marine captains, and even some fishing vessels - for disclosing reports of sightings relevant to US security.

Image borrowed from area51.stackexchange.com

Picture credit: area51.stackexchange.com server error page

Is there evidence that these, or similar laws or regulations exist?
Is it specifically illegal to investigate a crashed spaceship yourself, chat with the occupants, or discuss such a "genuine" event with others?

link|improve this question

Hi Paul, your question is off topic because it does not relate to skepticism. What are you being skeptical about? Please correct and improve and the community or moderators will reopen. Thank you :-) – Sklivvz Mar 26 '11 at 2:02
Sounds like I need to cite others' beliefs that there exists a body of law dealing with extraterrestrial contact. – Paul Mar 26 '11 at 2:04
it is to be noted that Unidentified Flying Object is not necessarily of extraterrestrial origin (or saucer-shaped for that matter); an Unidentified Flying Object is just an object which the observer cannot identify. – Lie Ryan Mar 26 '11 at 4:58
After my edits to shorten and clean up this question, if someone wants to take an additional crack at editing it, be my guest. – Paul Mar 26 '11 at 4:58
@Lie Yes, most everything you see in the sky is a UFO. "Unidentified" does not mean spaceship. If you see one, or the other, is it illegal to discuss it? Some people believe it is. Thats the question. – Paul Mar 26 '11 at 5:02
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

According to these references:

  1. Snopes research: http://www.snopes.com/legal/et.asp
  2. CFR Title 14, Section 1211 text and removal: http://www.textfiles.com/ufo/etxpos.txt

    (Alternate at http://paul.rutgers.edu/~mcgrew/ufo/cfr.1211 and others, could not be found on any .gov sites)

  3. Current Code of Federal Regulations Title 14: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/14cfrv5_01.html

The law did exist, but did not make contact illegal. Specifically, it made quarantine by the US government of an exposed person (exposed to any celestial body, such as the moon by the Apollo 11 crew) legal, in the event that any danger (think Andromeda Strain) was present (1211.104.a.3):

Determine that a particular person, property, animal, or other form of life or matter whatever is extraterrestrially exposed and quarantine such person, property, animal, or other form of life or matter whatever. The quarantine may be based only on a determination, with or without the benefit of a hearing, that there is probable cause to believe that such person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever is extraterrestrially exposed.

It has, apparently, been removed from the the books. The official .gov site for Title 14 simply says "Reserved" (3rd link), but the second link above contains supposed text of a 1991 removal of the quarantine section of the code:

Summary: NASA is removing 14 CFR part 1211 since it has served its purpose and is no longer in keeping with current policy.
Effective Date: April 26, 1991.

link|improve this answer
1  
Needs more blockquotes. :-) – Sklivvz Mar 26 '11 at 22:53
@Sklivvz - Fair enough, does that suffice? – NickC Mar 26 '11 at 22:59
lolz @sklivvz and Renesis :D – Cawas Mar 26 '11 at 23:04
It certainly suffices for my upvote! +1 – Sklivvz Mar 26 '11 at 23:04
#3 is the correct place to go if it is public law. Presumably the more factual sites could lead you there. – Paul Mar 27 '11 at 2:56
feedback

I'll take a stab here and say it doesn't matter. A true extraterrestrial contact would be such an unprecedented event that no laws could be enforced at a reasonable pace.

That said, if there are any laws about it they may have an impact in someone's life if the event is not real, like about 99% of the cases that go public. Even if they don't exist, investigating on unknown land by yourself and going after spaceships can always lead you to break some existing law that protects private land or government ships. So, caution is the least advice for any explorer who wants to investigate and reach out.

link|improve this answer
2  
I would say that exactly 100% of the cases that go public are not real. ;-) – Sklivvz Mar 26 '11 at 22:48
@Sklivvz Well, you know... 99, 100... They're virtually the same thing. I tend to use "100%" only in concepts. And thanks for the grammar fixes! – Cawas Mar 26 '11 at 23:02
You know, I could be convinced that there were people with private contact with aliens, given enough solid evidence, but so far everybody who's gone public has failed to show any evidence, and I'd think they'd show it if they had it. – David Thornley Mar 27 '11 at 4:23
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.