Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In my RSS feeds today, I got an article named Gunnar Glasses Reduce Computer Eyestrain, Are 75% Off for the Next Two Days which links to a previous article about their benefits:

Gunnar's website claims they protect your vision by filtering out "artificial" light, and relaxes your eyes, so you get tired slower. They also claim that it prevents dryness, but I'm not quite sure how it would go about doing that, since the glasses aren't like those James Worthy or Horace Grant goggles that encase your eyes—they're just normal glasses.

On Gunnar's own website, they claim:

GUNNARS increase contrast, comfort and focus while minimizing eye fatigue and visual stress for anyone who spends long hours staring at digital screens. GUNNAR eyewear is powered by i-AMP lens technology comprised of a proprietary lens material in an advanced geometry tuned for intermediate viewing distance and finished with custom formulated lens filters, tints and coatings.

For specific claims (that seem relevant):

  • Improve contrast and filter out UV.

    IONIK lens tints improve overall contrast and comfort by filtering out harsh artificial light, eliminating UV rays and reducing high-intensity visible light.

  • Anti-reflective.

    iFi lens coatings include an anti-reflective layers to reduce glare and an exterior hard coat that minimizes environmental damage and scratching.

  • Improved detail/focus.

    FRACTYL lens geometry includes a specifically tuned focusing power to enhance detail and a highly wrapped lens design that limits air currents near the eye.

Is there any evidence that these things actually reduce eye strain or fatigue? Or that they're beneficial at all?


I've seen a couple more articles about this recently, but they seem to be providing evidence that Gunnars are better than low-quality glasses, but they market them primarily to people who don't need glasses, so I think the relevant claim is that "wearing Gunnar glasses is better than not wearing glasses".

share|improve this question
"filtering out "artificial" sounds already alarming. What is that supposed to mean. Which frequencies? – Dmitry Ledentsov Oct 20 '12 at 12:18
@DmitryLedentsov The glasses are yellow, so I mean think they mean "blue light". – Brendan Long Oct 20 '12 at 16:04
1  
If one filters out the claims, all can be summarized into something like "a nice, relaxing tint with a UV filter, anti-glare coating and low optic distortion". Just about what one would expect from any good glasses. Sounds like marketing purely. All that might reduce eye strain, but that is perhaps not unique to these glasses – Dmitry Ledentsov Oct 20 '12 at 16:11
1  
I'm really not convinced it would even reduce eye strain.. – Brendan Long Oct 20 '12 at 16:16
It all depends, under what conditions. One could always find conditions, under which putting on any kind of tinted glasses would reduce eye strain. The question is, is it what the wearer wants, and is it useful in any way. With Occam's razor at hand, you can filter out IONIK, FRACTYL, iFi and i-AMP and you'll get plain old sunglasses. – Dmitry Ledentsov Oct 22 '12 at 7:27
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

I found an article on the subject. The ars article has some testimonial from the author that they do help.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2009/10/leveling-up-your-eyesight-with-gaming-glasses-ars-explores/

share|improve this answer
I'd rate the quotes from an independent expert explaining the terms as more trustworthy than a placebo-vulnerable anecdote. Oh, and welcome! – Oddthinking Feb 7 at 23:39
The optometrist talks about how clean, non-reflective glasses are better than dirty glasses, but I don't think that's really evidence for Gunnar's claims, since they market these as computer glasses for people who don't necessarily need prescription glasses, so I guess the claim I'm really looking at is if non-prescription Gunnars are worthwhile, or are Gunnar glasses better than no glasses? – Brendan Long Feb 7 at 23:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.