Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.
2  
This is a very good question. A substantial one, and should get an answer. – Vass Mar 22 '11 at 16:37
I suspect there is not conclusive evidence one way or the other on this, but I agree it is a good question. – anthony137 Mar 22 '11 at 17:53
Maybe you want to reword the title to "significant proportion" instead of "significant number"? Read Rachel Lloyd's Girls like Us if you want a number of sex abuse and sex trade stories. Or, are you asking about (in a relative sense) self-employed sex workers? – gatoatigrado Feb 9 '12 at 19:03
"most" would be very hard to prove. "a significant number" certainly have. Don't confuse this with the even harder question, does sexual abuse as a child CAUSE people to become sex-workers. – Michael Bishop Mar 17 '12 at 0:31
@Michael: IMHO "a significant number" isn't really a meaningful metric, and the claim Dr. Drew makes is "most". I edited the title to more accurately portray the claim he makes. I'd imagine it's nigh impossible to prove causality with what little data we have. – Patches Mar 18 '12 at 6:54

3 Answers

Since I study this and am an active part of the battle for sex worker rights and helping people understand the industry better, I think I can probably help with adding a little perspective.

Firstly, there is simply not information to back up Dr. Pinsky's claim. In fact, his claim is one that is extremely difficult to test, at this time, and it is unlikely to get enough data to make any such claim with any expectation of being remotely accurate. This is because most sex workers are not open about their sex work and most abuse victims are also averse to discussing their abuse. I'll discuss more about this in a moment.

I appreciate the articles that Alain posted, but they actually show a different correlation - that those who are already OK with discussing their experience with sexual abuse are more likely to discuss working in the sex trade. This, is unlikely to give us much information on a possible pattern within the sex industry, though, as there are too many variables that exist within both groups, those who have suffered sex abuse and those who have sold a sexual service, to paint us a very good picture of what we might see if we examined the histories of sex workers closer.

I run an organization, The Eastern Washington Sex Workers Outreach Project that has multiple goals for addressing issues that sex workers face. One of the functions is to fight for the rights that sex workers need to have a safer environment. Another purpose of the organization is to educate others about the realities of the sex industry (not the Hollywood version, not the anti-sex and anti-porn versions and not the wonderful sex world version, either, we want to educate a balanced version). We also try to address one of the common issues that sex workers face in that they are more likely to experience domestic violence and are less likely to be able to obtain help or resources that can help them escape it. Lastly, something that I provide on the side, which isn't a part of the umbrella SWOP organization, is peer counseling for fellow sex workers.

This position of being a sex worker and launching my own non profit organization designed to help them gives me a unique opportunity to examine questions such as this. Here's what I have found:

  1. Correlations between histories of sex work are much like other types of correlations that we find in other types of work. For example, just because there may be a higher rate of the abuse of controlled substances amongst doctors doesn't mean that we should treat the profession of a doctor differently or with the expectation that a doctor is likely a drug user.

  2. Sex workers who have a history of being sexually abused don't seem to number higher, per capita, than other women who I have counseled, in the past, who have suffered from being sexually abused. In other words, when I was a peer counselor for Domestic Violence Services in Oregon, the rate at which I counseled women who needed my help as a peer counselor who mentioned sexual abuse does not seem to be lower than the amount of sex workers who seek my help now who have experienced the same. This is a very small sample of people, though, and the subgroups are specific to the organizations within which I was functioning. Still, it is the best data that I have right now and I do think it is interesting and worth noting to dispel certain ideas that people have.

  3. If it is ever found to be the case that sex workers have a more common history of being sexually abused, this should not play a role in creating further prejudices against the industry. It is not the fault of the industry that this has happened and there is no evidence that sex work, itself, is somehow a negative consequence of such abuse. The reason the idea is reinforced that sex workers are more commonly victims is because it provokes emotions in people that often results in demonizing the industry, itself. However, there is nothing to show that this is either a useful or practical response to such information, were it even true.

  4. Most sex workers, regardless of history, seem to enjoy their work and many see it as empowering. One of the methods of treating victims of sexual abuse is to teach them to be empowered by their individual sexuality. If sex work is empowering to many women, it is perhaps the case that it is not an unhealthy way to deal with their experience. Of course, there is not really enough data to support or deny this hypothesis. I hope that there is room for research for this in the future.

Now, on to some other relevant information that is important for you to consider. Abuse victims, especially sexual abuse victims, in our culture, have a difficult time discussing their experiences with others. It is very common for abuse victims to avoid the subject, if at all possible and those who speak out often have difficulty discussing the details. Many counselors try to allow individuals to work within their capacity to deal with their problems, so there is little incentive to pull that information out of them (assuming the counselor is up-to-date on their psychology - in the past, some counselors would pry, and there is evidence that they either made the situation worse or accidentally recreated experiences).

When dealing with sex workers, many of them are very scared. In fact, the more legally and socially risky the job is, the less likely the worker is to be open about what they do for a living. This makes getting any information from them about their past or their life outside of their work extremely difficult. I know, I've tried. Sometimes, this problem is even more complicated when others are involved with the sex worker's business. If there is a pimp involved, or a boyfriend or girlfriend or even a contract holder, that will change how the sex worker interacts with others and can make it even more dangerous for them to disclose information. Here are some examples of that danger:

  1. In one of my early webcam model contracts, I met a mathematician who was contracted to the same company, who I became good acquaintances with. We often talked about science and math. My contract holder, at the time, ended up in an argument with her and she quit. In the process, though, the contract holder responded to her by threatening to tell the University she worked at about her work as an adult webcam model. She worked at a University that would certainly have fired her, if that had happened. This threat kept her from doing anything about it when the contract holder misbehaved.

  2. Recently, I made an accidental contact with an escort in Idaho. The girl's boyfriend was interested in a cat that I was giving away. When the conversation went into further detail about the agency she was working for, a person claiming to be her boyfriend took her phone and sent me a text telling me never to text her again.

  3. While I encounter many sex workers who are in support of or in need of help from my organization, most of them are unwilling to come out as sex workers. As a result, I have a great network of people, but my meetings tend to have very few attendees. out of dozens of contacts, just over a handful are willing to come to a meeting and discuss sex work and how to deal with our current social environment to improve our general status.

These factors, combined, I think, makes even testing a claim about sex workers and past sexual abuse a pretty difficult task. Even I don't think I have sufficient data to support one position or another.

Until we have a better social attitude about sex work, I am pretty sure it is unlikely we will uncover enough information to see if there is any correlation or not.

share|improve this answer
11  
Welcome to the site. :) While I enjoyed reading your answer it's very tangental with no supporting evidence past anecdotes. If you want us to value your answer more than that of the citation you took issue with, you need to show us better research that supports your claims. As it stands you are just saying "That's wrong" while pointing out some reasons why it could (but doesn't show that it is) be so, in a very long winded way. – Kit Sunde Mar 23 '11 at 7:22
14  
I explained why there wasn't supporting evidence beyond anecdote. research has not been done. So, yeah, all I have is anecdote, but that is better than what has been presented thus far. – SophieMonster Mar 23 '11 at 11:15
6  
I appreciate the point Sophie made. As Russel and BlueRaja noted, the article I posted was merely an attempt to link the two. Whatever their reasons might have been for justifying the correlation they were trying to make, there were surely many uncontrolled variables they simply could not account for, especially considering the sample size, and so many such resources should be required to suggest better-than-anecdotal evidence that the hypothesis is true or false. – Alain Mar 23 '11 at 12:42
4  
@Kit We can’t just hide behind a trope all the time. True, “The plural of anecdote is not data” but it’s the next best thing in the absence of data. It’s not as though Sophie claimed, like some homeopaths do, that her experience trumps all those rigorous studies. Because those don’t exist. She has in fact explicitly mentioned the weakness of her sample. Nobody here accepts this posting as the ultimate answer to the problem. – Konrad Rudolph Mar 25 '11 at 7:52
4  
@Konrad - It does (understandably) for her, but it shouldn't for us since we can't examine it. I never said anyone was taking her answer as the ultimate answer. I was just giving her a suggestion on how to improve her answer to convince us (as skeptics), as she seem to have an interest in doing so. I enjoy talking about anecdotes as the next person, but without any (at all) connecting evidence they are more for dinner parties than skeptics sites. Though I suppose it's entirely possible that my desire for references and objectivity is set higher than this community thinks is necessary. – Kit Sunde Mar 25 '11 at 8:33
show 9 more comments

This post does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

I was able to find a reference for you:

Studies have indicated that childhood abuse characteristics are associated with different sexual behavior outcomes for men and women. For example, Senn et al. (2007) found that for men, sexual abuse with force and penetration was associated with greater frequency of sex trading than it was for those who reported abuse without force and penetration. The term sex trading has been defined as participating in sex in return for food, money, sex, or shelter (Newman, Rhodes, & Weiss, 2004). Senn et al. (2006) found that women were more likely than men were to report exchanging sex for money or drugs and a childhood sexual experience that involved force.

The periodical quoted is: http://www.faqs.org/periodicals/201004/2004709811.html

And the article used by its reference (Senn et al., 2007) can be found at:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2042031/

Senn, T. E., Carey, M. P., Vanable, P. A., Coury-Doniger, P., & Urban, M. (2007). Characteristics of sexual abuse in childhood and adolescence influence sexual risk behavior in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 637-645.


Note that this links sex trade workers with sexual abuse victims. It does not suggest, as Dr. Pinsky stated, that most people in sex-related industries experienced abuse.

share|improve this answer
3  
Technically it doesn't link sex workers with sexual abuse, it does the opposite. That is duck is a bird, but not all birds are ducks. That's where you're going with that, I just want to make sure it's clear :) – Russell Steen Mar 22 '11 at 20:39
28  
@Russell: It is not even that; it is only a correlation, not an implication. That is, there is a correlation between being a bird and quacking, but that is not to say that one caused the other; perhaps there is an underlying cause. Perhaps children of poverty-stricken families are more likely to experience sexual abuse, and perhaps poor people are more likely to trade sex for money. In that case, it's possible the prostitution is unrelated to the sexual abuse; they are both results of an underlying cause. – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft Mar 22 '11 at 22:28
@blue - Good point. – Russell Steen Mar 22 '11 at 22:29
Seriously? "The term sex trading has been defined as participating in sex in return for ... sex". Doesn't that, by definition, make all forms of sex, "sex trading". – Kibbee Nov 29 '12 at 16:03

A new study that I just found says that there apparently is no difference between pornography stars and the general population (i.e. the "damaged goods" hypothesis). From the abstract:

The damaged goods hypothesis posits that female performers in the adult entertainment industry have higher rates of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), psychological problems, and drug use compared to the typical woman. The present study compared the self-reports of 177 porn actresses to a sample of women matched on age, ethnicity, and marital status. Comparisons were conducted on sexual behaviors and attitudes, self-esteem, quality of life, and drug use. Porn actresses were more likely to identify as bisexual, first had sex at an earlier age, had more sexual partners, were more concerned about contracting a sexually transmitted disease (STD), and enjoyed sex more than the matched sample, although there were no differences in incidence of CSA. In terms of psychological characteristics, porn actresses had higher levels of self-esteem, positive feelings, social support, sexual satisfaction, and spirituality compared to the matched group. Last, female performers were more likely to have ever used 10 different types of drugs compared to the comparison group. A discriminant function analysis was able to correctly classify 83% of the participants concerning whether they were a porn actress or member of the matched sample. These findings did not provide support for the damaged goods hypothesis.

An article on Slate discusses this a little more, and notes:

Stern’s routine line of questioning has fueled the perception that all porn performers are victims of child sexual abuse, and that their career choices are the result of this unresolved past trauma.

So this is more a case of confirmation bias and (as the Slate article states) some of the acresses lying.

Of course, this is a limited study in pornography (and I think even just the US industry). This does not cover prostitution and other sex industry workers.

This was too long for a comment, but I wanted to add this into the discussion.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.