Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

At a hearing before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, Sandra Fluke said:

"Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. 40% of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy."

Now this alone might not make her notable, since she is just a private citizen who testified at a single hearing during a Congressional recess, but a firestorm of controversy erupted when conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh called her a name. Additional, she has thrust herself into the public eye, most recently speaking at the Democratic National Convention, and is considered a poster child for the Democratic party.

Can contraception cost a woman over $3,000 during law school?

Do 40% of female students at Georgetown Law struggle financially to pay for contraceptives?

I know that these are two claims (and normally, they should be separated), but they are both highly related. Both are about the affordability of contraceptives to women in law school. The first question is technically true, it can cost $3,000. (Example: I could spend $1 million on transportation by purchasing a Bentley for each day of the week to take me to law school). This is really a question of if this claim is true, how much contraception would you have to use to spend $3,000, and is this a reasonable amount (i.e. see Bentley transportation). The second question is related to the first, and is a function of how much money it costs for contraceptives for women. Is $3,000 (assuming that is true) an amount of money that someone going to Georgetown Law school would struggle paying?

share|improve this question
3  
@vartec, Inserting and removing an IUD is an invasive procedure that many women might prefer to avoid. – Ilya Melamed Sep 11 '12 at 14:19
2  
I really like the "Bentley Transportation" argument here. Unless the school requires her to be on birth control (they don't) then there is no reason to complain. There are many cheap ways to prevent unwanted pregnancies including using condoms, or the ever popular choice, abstinence. IUD works so well because you can't "forget" to use it like you can with the pill, or condoms. – Kibbee Sep 11 '12 at 14:52
2  
I find it interesting that you defend Akin who merely claimed that "doctors told him", but you do not where Fluke argues students reported to her. – Oddthinking Sep 11 '12 at 14:59
4  
@kibee I disagree with the argument that there is no need for second form of contreceptive. I use to answer questions for people when it comes to contreceptivse (long story) so I'm a bit informed on the subject. Condoms aren't foolproof, especially amongst the young. The use of a second form of contreceptive ensures that even if one fails the other will work. It takes an admitedly rather small-but not negligable-risk of accidental pregnancy with just condom and drops it to nearly non-existant. More important with younger teens, but still good policy evne in college. – dsollen Sep 11 '12 at 15:10
2  
@Kibbee-- you're not factoring in the 'embarrassment' cost. A quick search of google scholar for condom purchase habits show that most condom use is prevented by the embarrassment of acquiring condoms in the first place. And, while you are correct that abstinence is the best way to avoid STI exposure, teaching abstinence as the sole means of birth control has been shown to be a failure (sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X07004260). People want to have sex, and saying that they shouldn't is not enough to stop them. – mmr Sep 11 '12 at 17:46
show 7 more comments

2 Answers

As there are two parts to this question, the answer will be broken into two parts; however, it should be noted that the question of affordability is subjective and depends on the person and that should be kept in mind.

Can contraception cost a woman over $3,000 during law school?

In general, in the United States, when a woman talks about contraception she is generally referring to some sort of oral contraceptive pill as opposed to supplying her partner with condoms.1 Searching for pricing information indicates that the prices generally seem to range between $9 to $100 depending on the source. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Since that is a fairly extreme range and there can be medical reasons (e.g. side effects, medical conditions) for not prescribing some forms of oral contraceptive versus others. Furthermore, these numbers are actually quite important since the Student Heath Insurance at Georgetown University does not cover "medication to prevent permanency." Given that the J.D. program at Georgetown Law is a minimum of three years (six semesters) we will assume that the majority of students graduate in that time frame, thus:

# Based on lowest cost generic
$9/month * 12 months * 3 years = $324

# Based on highest cited monthly cost
$100/month * 12 months * 3 years = $3600

As you can see, the range is quite extreme and but, yes it can cost a woman over $3,000 to take oral contraceptives over the course of law school.

Do 40% of female students at Georgetown Law struggle financially to pay for contraceptives?

This is an extraordinarily hard question to answer without knowing where that number came and some Googling didn't show evidence of a student survey being conducted on campus so that number may be from an "informal survey" and a bias might be involved. At best we can attempt to draw some conclusions based upon speculation, based the projected annual cost of living of $23,635 for a Georgetown Law student.

Speaking subjectively, going to school full time generally means you are spending around eight hours a day either in class or studying with some of the higher achievers doing more and others doing less. However, eight hours gives us a fairly reasonable number to work with. Assuming that someone is really eager to try and ensure they keep their debt to a minimum they might be able to pick up close to 40 hours a week worth of part time work. The minimum wage in Washington D.C. is $8.25/hour. As such, a diligent worker picking up 40 hours a week and working the full 52 weeks in a year will manage to bring in around $17,160 gross which would give them about $14,215.76 net after taxes, or about $273.38 per week (single with one exemption in Washington, D.C. using this calculator). Given that the $14,215.76 net is less than the $23,635 projected annual cost of living it is reasonable to speculate that students might struggle.

Granted these numbers are very simplistic and do not take into account being paid more per hour, working summer internships at a higher rate, relocating when school is not in session, and so forth. Which leads us back to the original statement that the question that 40% of female students struggle financially is likely unanswerable without more information as to where that number came from.


  1. From a cultural standpoint, in the United States men are generally expected to supply the condoms and as such, would be excluded from a woman's budget rendering the question moot. However, as condoms are not fail proof and it is still possible to get pregnant when they are used correctly, oral contraceptive is quite often used by women in conjunction to the use of condoms.
share|improve this answer
1  
It should be also noted that different women have different reactions to different brands of pills or other hormonal contraception devices. So not all women can take all brands of pills available, resulting in women "forced" to use the more expensive pills. – Ilya Melamed Sep 11 '12 at 13:32
You need a source for this, " fairly extreme range and there can be medical reasons for not prescribing some forms." You need to show that the different medically necessary versions of birth control do cost 100/month. What does Maximum Cost mean? If I am a BC supplier, and I charge $1000/month for pills that cost $4 at Wal-Mart, does that mean Sandra Fluke can claim that BC can cost $36,000 at law school? – user1873 Sep 11 '12 at 13:55
@RobZ, it would make more sense to use the cheapest source for the most expensive prescribed version of a type of drug. The active ingredient in a generic is the same as the Brand name, so you shouldn't use the more expensive version of it. An argument could be made for medical necessity of a different chemical, but you have not provided evidence of this yet. (and once again the cheapest source should be used). Otherwise, all that is necessary is to find a price gouging supplier that charges $1 million per month to make the Maximum Cost ridiculous. – user1873 Sep 11 '12 at 14:20
2  
Mayo Clinic - Choosing a birth control pill. Things like age, smoking, diabetes, history of breast cancer or stroke or heart disease,... can play a role. – Oliver_C Sep 11 '12 at 15:26
1  
At least in Europe you need to visit your GP and possibly a gynaecologist if you want to take the pill. There are many dosages, and a lot of collateral effects. One should clearly include any doctor visits in the total cost. – Sklivvz Sep 11 '12 at 17:23
show 5 more comments
up vote -4 down vote accepted

Cost of Georgetown Law and contraceptives.

Since Fluke's claim is 40% of women struggle to pay for contraceptives over the course of law school, it is important to know what the cost of contraceptives would be compared to full-time students and part-time students. For this portion of the analysis, we will assume that the 40% of women who are struggling financially are spending $3,000 at law school on contraceptives (we will get to the validity of that claim later).

Students in the full-time program are expected to graduate at the end of three academic years, Students in the part-time program are expected to graduate within four academic years of being accepted. Living expenses are around $22,895/year. Full-time students (tuition) cost = $40,920/year, Full-time students (contraceptive) cost = $1000/year, Part-time students (tuition) cost = $33,500/year, Part-time students (contraceptive) cost = $750/year. Using these numbers:

  • Full-time cost of contraceptives = 1.6% of total, 2.4% of tuition, 4.4% of living expenses.
  • Part-time cost of contraceptives = 1.33% of total, 2.23% of tuition, 4.4% of living expenses.

The majority of students did not receive any scholarship money (557 of 1990 according to top-law-schools, only 9.9% according to lawschoolnumbers), and of those the majority received less than half tuition in aid. The median grant amount was $15,000 (FT), and $8,900 (PT). If 40% of women struggle financially to afford contraceptives, the best case scenario is, 239 women with no financial aid are struggling to pay $3,000 out of $191k over 3 years (1.6%), and the remaining students with a median $15,000 of financial aid are struggling to pay $3,000 out of $146k over 3 years (2.1%). $3,000 is a miniscule expense compared to the cost of graduating from Georgetown Law. It is highly unlikely that 40% of the total students at Georgetown Law are capable of paying $146k-$191k over a 3 year period, but are struggling to pay $3,000. Even if you only compare this expense to just tuition & fees, it only amounts to 3.1%. This is especially true when you take the cost of rising tuition&fees (page 6) into account, (2010-11), (2011-12), (2012-13).

 |2005-06|2006-07|2007-08|2008-09|2009-10|2010-11|2011-12|2012-13|
 +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
 |$35,080|$37,220|$39,390|$42,065|$43,750|$45,105|$46,865|$48,835|

Over an 8 year period, tuition and fees have increased $13,755 (40%). The average increase over a 3-year period is $5,158 (not adjusted for inflation). This is nearly 60% more than the cost of contraception for women over a 3-year period that Sandra Fluke claimed a woman could spend.

What is the cost of contraceptives, could it really be $3,000 over 3-4 years?

The previous section, we know that Full-time students would spend on average $1000/year, and Part-time students would spend on average $750/year. The cost of different forms of birth control are:

Birth Control pill ($15-$50 at planned parenthood) = $9/month (Target, but Fluke didn't know) = $108/year (Target)

Depo-Provera ($35-$75+exam($20-$40)) = $55-$115/quarter = $220-$460/year

IUD ($500-$1,000) at PP = $175-$400/5-10 years according to American Pregnacy

The costs here aren't enough to account for the yearly expenses. IUDs are the most expensive, but dividing the cost over the life of the IUD means that it is cheaper than Depo-Provera. What if we include the cost of condoms as well. If we take the most expensive birth control (Depo-Provera), and figure out how much is left for condoms (PT student = $530-$290, FT student = $780-$540). This assumes that the woman's male partner never pays for condoms, and that the woman never receives free condoms from a local planned parenthood. According to the American Pregnancy Association, condoms cost:

With a little shopping around, and buying larger packs, condoms shouldn't cost too much. One experimenter found that the cost of two major brands in the large count boxes (24-36 each) was between $0.41-$0.79 (In large bulk sizes 1000 count, that cost could be reduced to $0.15-$0.16. This might come in handy, as you will see later on).

  • Part-Time Low Estimate = $290/$0.79 = 367 condoms/year = 1 condoms/day.
  • Part-Time High Estimate = $530/$0.41 = 1292 condoms/year = 3.5 condoms/day
  • Full-Time Low Estimate = $540/$0.79 = 683 condoms/year = 1.87 condoms/day
  • Full-Time High Estimate = $780/$0.41 = 1902 condoms/year = 5.2 condoms/day

  • Super 1000 bulk buy = PT student (5-9/day) or FT student (9-13 condoms/day)

With a little shopping around, Sandra Fluke and other Georgetown Law students would be able to have sex 5-13 times/day. If you plan to have sex this often, it would make sense to by in the 1000 count bulk, instead of struggling to pay for such small (24-36 count) quantities. Condoms have a 3-5-year shelf life. How does this compare to the normal sex life of the average woman? The National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior has these numbers for women who have sex 4 or more times per week (age range chosen because it listed the highest percentages):

|Woman    |18-24|25-29|
+---------+-----+-----+
|Single   | 4.9%|10.1%|
|Partnered| 7.5%|12.8%|
|Married  |23.5%| 2.0%|

The vast majority (76%-90%) of women are only having sex 3 or fewer times per week.

In Conclusion

To spend $3,000 on birth control over 3-4 years of law school, a woman would need to use a combined birth control, and condoms to protect themselves. If they shop around, and buy condoms in bulk, If they bought their condoms in bulk, they can have sex between 5-13 times per day. If they use the birth control pill instead of the shot, they can double those numbers. And if they requested that their partners buy condoms half the time, they can double those numbers again.

It is highly unlikely that 40% of Georgetown Law students are struggling to pay for birth control, unless they differ vastly with respect to most 18-29 year olds. For a woman to use $3000 over the course of 3-4 years would require her to have sex an unusual amount. For this reason, it is highly unlikely that it can cost $3000 for a woman at Georgetown Law to buy contraceptives.

share|improve this answer
5  
Why do you compare the cost of contraceptives to tuition fees - don't most students have student loans to cover their tuition fees? That would make most of your first section irrelevant, it should be compared to disposable income. Your condom calculations are a strawman and the inference (1000 bulk buy) is also offensive. You should at least assume the "worst" case - a student who uses a lot of condoms and buys them where most people do, at convenience or grocery stores or chemists, in a small quantity. – jozzas Sep 11 '12 at 4:54
2  
@jozzas, Should I really have to give the "worst" case. These 40% of women are "struggling" to pay for contraceptives. Shouldn't they take some initiative to reduce their costs? The pill is a quarter the price of Depo, most women are only having sex 3 or fewer times per week. For Sandra Flukes numbers to work out, you have to find a woman who is either having sex a disproportionate amount of time, or is taking little effort to reduce her costs. Why should we believe that a woman is struggling if she won't even take the simplest of measures to make her contraceptives affordable? – user1873 Sep 11 '12 at 5:57
5  
What choices people make with their own money isn't relevant - you need to assess the claim. If 40% of women are struggling, showing that they wouldn't be if they made different choices doesn't prove anything. You aren't assessing the claim by showing that you can buy condoms in bulk at a discounted rate, or by showing that $3000 is a small fraction of tuition fees. The question clearly says can contraception cost $3000?, and IMO you haven't really answered that. – jozzas Sep 11 '12 at 6:22
9  
Her political leanings are completely off topic, and yours should be also. What she's lobbying for isn't relevant, and it goes to show that you haven't assessed the claim on its own, but that your own opinion/bias/agenda has crept into your answer. – jozzas Sep 11 '12 at 6:37
2  
@jozzas, My answer provided mathematical examples for why her claim is unreasonable. My answer showed how many times you would have to be having sex per day (4+ times more than most people) for contraceptives to cost $3,000. While I differ from you regarding "struggling" (ie I wouldn't say I was struggling with hunger if I couldn't afford steak and lobster every day), The math shows that she is lying or Georgetown law women are unlike most 18-29 yo. My answer does not contain bias, comments maybe, but your bias is showing by downvoting my answer instead of flagging the comment. – user1873 Sep 11 '12 at 10:39
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.