Tell me more ×
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Baby flashcards have grown in popularity. They are advertised with seemingly amazing effects, like 1½ year old reading and counting.

On the other hand academics seem to either say that they don't have long term positive effect, or worse yet, that they have negative effect (child did not learn at that age, what it should have normally have learnt, for example socializing). See Pat Wolfe's Q&A or book by Kathy Hirsh-Pasek "Einstein Never Used Flash Cards"

Are there any scientific, evidence-based, studies showing that they have either positive or negative effect on children?

Related question: Is “Your Baby Can Read” effective and helpful?

share|improve this question
1  
How is this different from the other question? – nico Aug 14 '12 at 17:12
@nico: other question answer is basically "TV is bad for babies", which is irrelevant in case of flashcards. – vartec Aug 14 '12 at 20:23
well... it's about "learning to read using a memorization method on TV", not really about TV. – nico Aug 15 '12 at 7:56
@nico: still, the only and accepted answer is "TV is bad for babies". – vartec Aug 20 '12 at 8:38

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.